Court case gaining interest. Baby Will needs an operation and his parents want unvaxxed blood. Drs refused applied for guardianship. Eyes on. https://www.bitchute.com/video/awHPKJyEGNwI/?list=notifications&randomize=false
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Said this in another thread:
The problem is that the establishment have identified this child as needing heart surgery, and TBH the baby looks pretty ill, and should have had the surgery weeks ago.
The parents are not denying this medical treatment, so they are not nut-jobs who refuse treatment and abusing their child - they are only demanding a better blood product - for the safety of their child. And given that this illness involves the heart, and given that people are keeling over from myo-and pericarditis after a jab, one can totally understand their concern.
The problem, as identified by others, is not the parents, but the precedent a favorable ruling will set. Allowing them the privilege of taking advantage of a generous donation from a pureblood will open Pandora's box. What? The jab causes heart issues? The government cannot allow this.
I don't know if this will work, but please send outraged emails to the email address for the high court in Auckwack:
[email protected].
Also the agency that is claiming these parents are conspiracy theorists and should therefore lose their baby have several email adresses:
https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/about-us/contact-us/#:~:text=To%20make%20an%20information%20request,%40health.govt.nz.
Thanks for the links :). The fact that the NZ Blood Bank were happy to accommodate you nominating where you received blood - before and the fact that this VAX is under emergency use is the difference IMO