Q Posts- Remember your Oath- reminder for Brunson v Adams SCOTUS 22-380 Case?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
Great reminder Anon!
It is worth noting again that the Brunson v Adams case is not a criminal case, but a civil one that is directly confronting the violation of the Oath of Office that required that there be an investigation into the evidence presented regarding the election integrity. In their rush to certify 2020, the respondents of the BvA case violated their Oath of Office, and in so doing, as argued by the Brunson Brothers, nullified their right to hold public office.
If SCOTUS rules in favor of Brunson, they will be ruling that the 388 respondents no longer have the right to hold office now, or ever again due to their violation of their Oath of Office.
If this case is won, and I pray it is, it could start a whole domino effect because politicians at every level of government are guilty of this. From city, to county to state, to federal. For far too long, too many have ignored and even flouted their oaths of office and the people have not held them accountable. We are all getting a big wake up call to learn and know our constitution and actually use it as intended. This is big.
I think this is why the whole oath thing was a big part of the Q movement over the years. TBH, it all sounded strange at the time but it seems to make more and more sense with this Brunson SCOTUS case!
Many of we the people (Americans) have failed our Founding Fathers. But it's not over and we still have a chance to actually start doing what WE the people need to do, and that means holding those we elect to their oaths.
Perfect for thee mass lineup. Nice!!