The SC better think very carefully re. their ruling on the Brunson case. If they can not see the election fraud, the points raised by the Brunson brothers that Congress failed their oath to take a 10 day pause and investigate and then rule accordingly, then they too are corrupt and must be removed.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security.
Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
The SC better think very carefully re. their ruling on the Brunson case. If they can not see the election fraud, the points raised by the Brunson brothers that Congress failed their oath to take a 10 day pause and investigate and then rule accordingly, then they too are corrupt and must be removed.
The Brunson case is not about fraud at all. It is about national security and the violation of the Oath of Office all politicians take. Those that voted against investigating potential fraud have violated the oath "To protect and defend..." hence, it is a breech in national security. Where the Supreme Court had better think carefully is if they decide against this case, THEY are violating their own oath to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore, national security.
https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html?fbclid=IwAR0OKVlapmCGMbE4MZqJ78AA4fv2jSpH8LEozBamL_2oFebW8Yjy49-SWWE
It's quite brilliant. If they decide against it, military is the only way and ALL should be removed from office that violated their oath.
Don’t we have organized militia that can step up if military fails since they have gone woke?
Pretty much the National Guard. That is a good question.