Arguments for/against Mike Lindell for the RNC chair?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
I wanted to get an honest, unbiased (in comparison to Truth Social) analysis on the pros and cons of having Mike Lindell given the RNC chair over the other candidates gunning for Ronna McDaniel's position. Truth Social is going all in on Mike Lindell, but when I read up on their reasons why, it seema that it is more out of emotional bias than any actual calculated reason. I would think PDW will have the same problem and that all other networks will exhibit the exact opposite reaction..which leads to here.
With that being said, what are pros and/or cons of letting Mike Lindell have the RNC Chair?
Can you think of anyone better suited?
Lee Zeldin? Harmeet Dhillon? Lee Zeldin ran one hell of a campaign and caused the Demonic Rats in NY to panic spend there when they realize that they are losing. Sure people will think of him of a quitter for conceding, but there is conceding when you have Kari Lake's numbers, and there is conceding when the gap between yourself and Hochul is around twice the population of NY's second largest city. I doubt we would find enough fraud to negate THAT.
Harmeet Dhillon is one of Trump's steadfast allies, has a ton of experience in the political and legal arena (she is the co-chair for Women For Trump group that appeared at many of his rallies). She also has opposed many of tyrannical Clot-shot policies like Face-Masks.
I would be find with any of those three taking the seat, but I am concerned that Lindell's lack of political experience and his rather-extreme viewpoints will only hurt his chances to get the seat.