Fellow anon WeekoWolf posted an interesting Tweet this morning (https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXHKvmgi/power-and-influence-at-the-highe/c/) regarding a subject I've been chewing on for weeks now and I'm positive it's something that some of you have been chewing on as well.

The fact stated in this tweet is an example of why I believe there must be far, far more to Elon's acquisition of Twatter than what we can currently see. We've all heard rumblings that at least one intel agency owned servers within the Twatter server farm and I was able to privately confirm that to be the case.

Obviously, the world is now catching up to anons in discovering that Jim Baker and Fauci's daughter worked for Twatter, along with the obvious political and medical censorship that the platform engaged in.

But of course this is just what we know so far and perhaps more importantly, it's what the IC and Twatter leadership weren't able to hide/destroy before the purchase was finalized.

Where I'm heading with this is that it seems impossible to me that Musk was able to buy Twatter without substantial help from powerful players. Like it or not, Twatter is by far the most influential social media platform in the world. It was a major weapon of the deep state/IC for years, especially the last 3. No way in hell that they'd simply let Musk purchase the platform unless they were out maneuvered and out muscled.

(Obviously there's an alternative theory here in that the IC gave up nothing and Musk is simply a wolf in sheep's clothing. But I'm not seeing evidence of that yet)

Of course the other question is whether Musk was able to obtain data before the purchase went through of what I can only assume would be innumerable things deleted/destroyed by the IC within the Twatter server and software stack.

Curious to get some thoughts on this, anons.