This is a perfect example of who really thinks they owns our kids. In America, it is the same. If parents knew what the courts really believe they'd be outraged. I wrote about this several years ago.

03-29-19 On Who Owns the Children

Blair Adams wrote: WHO OWNS THE CHILDREN? (subtitled "Public Compulsion, Private Responsibility, and the Dilemma of Ultimate Authority," Waco, Texas: Truth Forum, 1991, Fifth edition). The author examines some of the court cases and legal precedents that shed light on this important question. In his "Preface" he writes:

[A]ccording to the courts of this land, ... "A child is primarily" not his parents' offspring but "a ward of the [S]tate"; ... parents hold relationship he owes allegiance to the government"; ... parents serve as a mere "guardianship" which "the government places [the child] under"; ... parental authority must be "at all times exercised in subordination to the paramount and overruling direction of the [S]tate"; ... "the natural rights of a parent to the custody and control of... his child are subordinate to the power of the [S]tate";... in deciding whether parent or State will control a child's education, the child's academic progress under the parents - even as measured by State-approved tests - has been termed by State prosecutors as "irrelevant and immaterial"; and finally ... such legal principles and policies form the basis of all this nation's compulsory education laws. (pp. Xix-xx)

http://voluntaryist.com/backissues/059.pdf

In Black's Law Dictionary look up Parens Patriae. Parens Patriae means literally, “parent of the country.” It refers traditionally to the role of STATE as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability.

With the birth registration established, the federal government, under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, had the mechanism to take over all the assets of the American people and put them into debt into perpetuity. Under this doctrine, if one is born with a disability, the state, (the sovereign) has the responsibility to take care of you. This author believes that the disability you are born with is, in fact, the birth itself.

And you didn't know that?

The attorney bar association has many secrets that they don't want you to know about. It's a big club and you are not part of it.

If the American people actually knew the secrets that the court systems hide, they'd be marching in the streets.

SEVEN ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTION http://abundancechild.com/the-7-elements-of-jurisdiction/

See Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4, Attorney & client: The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys. After you have read the foregoing, ask your attorney to see a copy of "regarding Lawyer Discipline & other rules" Also Canons 1 through 9.

Corpus Juris Secundum assumes courts will operate in a lawful manner. If the accused makes this assumption, he may learn, to his detriment, through experience, that certain questions of law, including the question of personal jurisdiction, may never be raised and addressed, especially when the accused is represented by the bar. (Sometimes licensed counsel appears to take on the characteristics of a fox guarding the hen house. ) Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. Se McNutt v. GMAC, 298 US 178. The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in Maxfield's Lessee v Levy, 4 US 308.

03-28-19 On Wards if the State

A license is a 'privilege' granted solely by the State. Being a Christian man, I never quite understood why there are such things as "marriage licenses" when the act of marriage is a natural consequence to the Creator's design.

If one researches it, they will find that its origin is rather sinister.

In Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Addition, look up "marriage license" and follow its references).

Recognize that the issuance of licenses are a monopolistic profit center for government. Plain and simple.

The idea of contracts is a very good idea. However, whenever a contract competes with a government monopoly, there is always going to be conflict.

The reason for this is because individuals are considered 'wards of the state'; also referred to as a 'ward of the court'. In many States, a 'ward of the state' refers to individuals who are or were incarcerated. To emphasize, 'incarceration' does not make one independent. And 'not being independent' is the key phrase to understanding what is meant by being a 'ward of the state'.

The legal definition of 'ward of the state' is:

"infants and persons of unsound mind placed by the court under the care of a guardian".

In legal terms, courts view 'defendants' as wards of the court. You will never hear this in court though. This why you are to be represented by the court officer; an attorney. Don't be fooled, your attorney ultimately works for the judge in the court room.

A new tactic for declaring individuals as a 'ward of the state', is by issuing ex parte orders for placing all personal assets, business property, and the individual themselves into 'receivership'. Read Barbara Hollingsworth's, "Federal Judge Puts Internet Pioneer in Civil Lockdown" in the Examiner.

In view of this, the James Stewart and Rawesome Foods tragedy fits well with this growing precedent. It's mind boggling that the government are increasingly stripping Americans of all their rights. It's not hard to see wherever rights have been extinguished, slavery flourishes.

If Americans are considered by the courts as "wards of the state" (of unsound minds), then why do we see so many insane acts of government?

Any purposeful act contrary to Nature's Laws is an act of an unsound mind. The risks of radiation contamination from nuclear power is insanity. Computer voting machines is insanity. mRNA gene-modified tainted blood donor-ship is madness. Normalizing genital butchery and cross sex hormonal medicating is crazy. Making natural healing illegal, is an insane act, etc., etc. etc.

Who is of an unsound mind here? I think it is these people in government.