The conversation is in relation to Twitter doing something, or nothing, about child exploitation. Learn to follow a fucking conversation... They're clearly talking about enforcement.
This doesn't mean anything other than that... It doesn't absolve anyone of anything...
you are totally illogical, Everything you just said is an emotional lie and fallacy. Apparently you have little reading comprehension skill. I would try to explain this further but doubt you have the capacity to learn. oh what the hell, All Donny said wat the tile of the OP is inaccurate, for you to accuse him of supporting Twitters inaction on child traffiking is total insanity on your part. Donny said NO such thing.
Learn: Logic, critical analysis, and reading comprehension. Good luck
That's not what he's saying.
He's claiming it's false that they "refused to take action"
Are you fucking serious? FFS
The conversation is in relation to Twitter doing something, or nothing, about child exploitation. Learn to follow a fucking conversation... They're clearly talking about enforcement.
This doesn't mean anything other than that... It doesn't absolve anyone of anything...
you are totally illogical, Everything you just said is an emotional lie and fallacy. Apparently you have little reading comprehension skill. I would try to explain this further but doubt you have the capacity to learn. oh what the hell, All Donny said wat the tile of the OP is inaccurate, for you to accuse him of supporting Twitters inaction on child traffiking is total insanity on your part. Donny said NO such thing.
Learn: Logic, critical analysis, and reading comprehension. Good luck
Could be. But it's certainly ambiguous.
Musk's reply confirms that is what they're talking about.