Magnetic fields require poles and there is no counter-argument. It is a natural consequence of Maxwell's equations and the necessary presence of an electric current. The Earth's field is hard to explain at all, but the geophysicists like to think the core is a magnetic transformer of the Sun's field. The alternative explanation is the Earth is a homopolar generator, developing a magnetic field by virtue of the rotation of a charged body (the Earth). But this is all part of the Earth being round, so it is nothing but a distraction from the main point.
NASA fakery? Bring it on. Air bubbles? Those are water condensation droplets from the suit environmental control system. Air bubbles don't behave by traveling in a straight line. No water tank exercise is as optically clear as a spacewalk. You are straining at gnats.
You've run out of slurs against Masons. I have my criticisms of NASA, but I don't need bigotry to power them.
The atmosphere fades away into lower and lower pressure. Look it up. There is no hard barrier to zero pressure. In fact there is no zero pressure. It just gets very small. There is the near-Earth medium. There is the cislunar medium. There is the interplanetary medium. There is the extra-solar-system medium. And there is the interstellar medium. And probably the intergalactic medium. The particle density just keeps going smaller and smaller.
None of my points rest on authority. Magellan was around before NASA. Astronomers were around before NASA. Cartographers were around before NASA. All that NASA provided was manned space flight and photos from orbital altitude. You don't like NASA? Try Russia. They publish their scientific findings. Try airlines and shipping lines. They go all over the globe---and know it is a globe. People have visited and can still visit the South Pole. All this information existed before NASA, so give up that comfort blanket.
You show an interesting and essentially mysterious electrical circuit for the electric field of the Earth. So what? It doesn't prove the Earth is flat. And a charged Earth is consistent with what we know. You have no positive case for your claim of a flat Earth. Just questions originating from your ignorance.
The counter is NOT that the earth is a monopole, just a different configuration than you're expecting when thinking in terms of the globe model. You would need to think more in terms of an electromagnetic field.
No, air bubbles escaping from the craft and bubbling away, like it was filmed in a pool. It's tricky to find the videos because youtube suppresses those videos. Here's one I found (not the greatest sample I would use, but covers the bases and is short): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hz5xNxMP5lA
The rest is just repeating again, that navigation is done treating the travel area as flat. Planes do not need to make adjustments for the globe, they set direction and altitude and can set an autopilot to hold that vector and will end up at the destination.
No, that doesn't prove "flatness" but that effect DOES require a second material to achieve that kind of capacitance, which the bible calls firmament.
We already know what the terrestrial magnetic field is, and it has poles like all fields of its kind. No different configuration needed (and your diagram had nothing to do with magnetism).
This was a crummy video. The image was not clear and the supposed critical evidence was hard to distinguish. I've seen better, but the better versions show water droplets going away in a straight line, like it was filmed in outer space. I've seen the pool exercises. Lots of bubbles and murk in the way.
Planes set their direction per a spherical Earth, obtaining coordinates from the GPS system (orbiting around a spherical Earth) and inertial navigation. And the distances across the southern hemisphere are shorter than they would be on a disk map. There is no way a flat Earth works for navigation. Or for cartography---a point you keep ducking.
The Bible called it whatever it was translated it into, according to the understanding at the time. In the days of the Egyptians (of which Moses was educated as one), they supposed the existence of a firmament. It was a mistaken conception. There is no "firmament." There is outer space. It is also translated "heaven," which is closer to the truth. You have to decide in favor of truth over translation. God does not fool us with His creation. If you deny His creation, you are also denying Him.
If you have a crucial point of evidence, it can be stated in a sentence or two. It should not take an hour of wasted time to digest. I don't ask you to go study videos; I give you the information straight up because I understand it. The fact that you can't do this is a "tell" that you don't understand your own point of view.
P.S. I took a look at that hour-long video and it opened with absolute drivel based on total ignorance. I pity you that you could find it persuasive.
Yes, except you can't have a molten magnet (the globe model), you CAN have a disk magnet where the interior is north and the outer rim is south. Generates the same magnetic Flux.
Like I said about the spacewalk, not the best example, but there are numerous examples, the best videos get buried by the algorithms. Once you spot the bubble you see it rise like a bubble floating to the surface of a pool. (They happen to train for spacewalks in a pool)
You can't have watched past the first or second points, which comes off a little cringey. The 8 inches square per mile distance is accurate up to about 3000 miles distance, meanwhile there are photos showing mountains hundreds of miles away that should be hidden completely by the geometric horizon, covers refraction, and more.
The fact is that there isn't any 1-2 pieces of evidence that can Wipeout decades of indoctrination.
The Bible describes the firmament as what was created to separate the "waters above from the waters below", and always references the "face" of the Earth. Once again, Von Braun chose a specific verse that referenced the firmament to be added on his tombstone.
There are poles and the Earth is round. As I mentioned (but you didn't catch it), the Earth could be generating the field as a homopolar generator (rotating charged sphere)
There are environmental control system condensation droplets. They go in straight paths, not like bubbles.
When argument number one is a complete ignorance of the effect of perspective, I don't bother any farther. They blew it. Refraction can greatly extend the ability to see things close to the Earth limb (fata morgana). This is commonplace with air defense radar systems, which use a 4/3 Earth radius technique to estimate horizon range for radar. This effect dwindles with altitude.
No, all it takes is one good piece of evidence. That is always the way it is in theories---but you are proposing a fantasy at odds with observed experience, so you will not succeed.
Magnetic fields require poles and there is no counter-argument. It is a natural consequence of Maxwell's equations and the necessary presence of an electric current. The Earth's field is hard to explain at all, but the geophysicists like to think the core is a magnetic transformer of the Sun's field. The alternative explanation is the Earth is a homopolar generator, developing a magnetic field by virtue of the rotation of a charged body (the Earth). But this is all part of the Earth being round, so it is nothing but a distraction from the main point.
NASA fakery? Bring it on. Air bubbles? Those are water condensation droplets from the suit environmental control system. Air bubbles don't behave by traveling in a straight line. No water tank exercise is as optically clear as a spacewalk. You are straining at gnats.
You've run out of slurs against Masons. I have my criticisms of NASA, but I don't need bigotry to power them.
The atmosphere fades away into lower and lower pressure. Look it up. There is no hard barrier to zero pressure. In fact there is no zero pressure. It just gets very small. There is the near-Earth medium. There is the cislunar medium. There is the interplanetary medium. There is the extra-solar-system medium. And there is the interstellar medium. And probably the intergalactic medium. The particle density just keeps going smaller and smaller.
None of my points rest on authority. Magellan was around before NASA. Astronomers were around before NASA. Cartographers were around before NASA. All that NASA provided was manned space flight and photos from orbital altitude. You don't like NASA? Try Russia. They publish their scientific findings. Try airlines and shipping lines. They go all over the globe---and know it is a globe. People have visited and can still visit the South Pole. All this information existed before NASA, so give up that comfort blanket.
You show an interesting and essentially mysterious electrical circuit for the electric field of the Earth. So what? It doesn't prove the Earth is flat. And a charged Earth is consistent with what we know. You have no positive case for your claim of a flat Earth. Just questions originating from your ignorance.
The counter is NOT that the earth is a monopole, just a different configuration than you're expecting when thinking in terms of the globe model. You would need to think more in terms of an electromagnetic field.
No, air bubbles escaping from the craft and bubbling away, like it was filmed in a pool. It's tricky to find the videos because youtube suppresses those videos. Here's one I found (not the greatest sample I would use, but covers the bases and is short): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hz5xNxMP5lA
The rest is just repeating again, that navigation is done treating the travel area as flat. Planes do not need to make adjustments for the globe, they set direction and altitude and can set an autopilot to hold that vector and will end up at the destination.
No, that doesn't prove "flatness" but that effect DOES require a second material to achieve that kind of capacitance, which the bible calls firmament.
This one is an hour long, but addresses every point you've made and more. https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/TheTop20ProofsEarthisNotaSpinningGlobe:b
I'm just not wanting to keep repeating, and the limits of text form preclude adequate explanation.
We already know what the terrestrial magnetic field is, and it has poles like all fields of its kind. No different configuration needed (and your diagram had nothing to do with magnetism).
This was a crummy video. The image was not clear and the supposed critical evidence was hard to distinguish. I've seen better, but the better versions show water droplets going away in a straight line, like it was filmed in outer space. I've seen the pool exercises. Lots of bubbles and murk in the way.
Planes set their direction per a spherical Earth, obtaining coordinates from the GPS system (orbiting around a spherical Earth) and inertial navigation. And the distances across the southern hemisphere are shorter than they would be on a disk map. There is no way a flat Earth works for navigation. Or for cartography---a point you keep ducking.
The Bible called it whatever it was translated it into, according to the understanding at the time. In the days of the Egyptians (of which Moses was educated as one), they supposed the existence of a firmament. It was a mistaken conception. There is no "firmament." There is outer space. It is also translated "heaven," which is closer to the truth. You have to decide in favor of truth over translation. God does not fool us with His creation. If you deny His creation, you are also denying Him.
If you have a crucial point of evidence, it can be stated in a sentence or two. It should not take an hour of wasted time to digest. I don't ask you to go study videos; I give you the information straight up because I understand it. The fact that you can't do this is a "tell" that you don't understand your own point of view.
P.S. I took a look at that hour-long video and it opened with absolute drivel based on total ignorance. I pity you that you could find it persuasive.
Yes, except you can't have a molten magnet (the globe model), you CAN have a disk magnet where the interior is north and the outer rim is south. Generates the same magnetic Flux.
Like I said about the spacewalk, not the best example, but there are numerous examples, the best videos get buried by the algorithms. Once you spot the bubble you see it rise like a bubble floating to the surface of a pool. (They happen to train for spacewalks in a pool)
You can't have watched past the first or second points, which comes off a little cringey. The 8 inches square per mile distance is accurate up to about 3000 miles distance, meanwhile there are photos showing mountains hundreds of miles away that should be hidden completely by the geometric horizon, covers refraction, and more.
The fact is that there isn't any 1-2 pieces of evidence that can Wipeout decades of indoctrination.
The Bible describes the firmament as what was created to separate the "waters above from the waters below", and always references the "face" of the Earth. Once again, Von Braun chose a specific verse that referenced the firmament to be added on his tombstone.
There are poles and the Earth is round. As I mentioned (but you didn't catch it), the Earth could be generating the field as a homopolar generator (rotating charged sphere)
There are environmental control system condensation droplets. They go in straight paths, not like bubbles.
When argument number one is a complete ignorance of the effect of perspective, I don't bother any farther. They blew it. Refraction can greatly extend the ability to see things close to the Earth limb (fata morgana). This is commonplace with air defense radar systems, which use a 4/3 Earth radius technique to estimate horizon range for radar. This effect dwindles with altitude.
No, all it takes is one good piece of evidence. That is always the way it is in theories---but you are proposing a fantasy at odds with observed experience, so you will not succeed.
The "waters above" could well be plasma, which is pervasive in space. Von Braun liked the quotation in its reference to the heavens. He knew the Earth was round, having launched our first satellite, and our first astronaut with vehicles he designed. Here's a photo from the Orion spacecraft returning to Earth. https://www.tellerreport.com/tech/2022-12-11-mission-artemis-1--the-orion-spacecraft-returns-to-earth.r10-c5Xdo.html.