BREAKING: SEC's Indictment of FTX's Bankman-Freid Released - Any Mention of the AMOUNT of Donations from FTX to Politicians is O...
The court filing of the SEC’s case against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was released this morning. Attached below is the filing with some initial observations. Bob Bishop shared these observations with TGP this morning and on Twitter. The complaint is 28 pages...
Sam Bankman-Fried faces up to 115 years in prison if convicted on all eight counts. Video and sources at https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXQmoxUM/
Dude, you steal millions or even billions and move to a county that has extradition with USA, you should of move to one of these shit holes places. Can’t fix stupid! An extradition treaty is the legal mechanism countries use to pull alleged criminals out of other countries. The terms and conditions vary. Some countries, like France and Brazil, won’t extradite their own citizens, no matter the circumstance. Places that USA can’t grab you but the cia can put a bullet into u. The following countries have been known to refuse U.S. extradition requests, despite having treaties: Bolivia, Ecuador, Iceland, Nicaragua, Switzerland, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.
Escaping to a non-extradition-treaty country does not mean you are home free. It simply puts you at the mercy of your new hosts. You could become a pawn in a larger game and might be traded away for concessions. The political sands are always shifting, and tomorrow’s government may be more accommodating to the U.S.
The CIA could also kidnap you and bring you back to the U.S. without your host government’s consent. Or you might fall within sight of an armed drone. No matter where you go, there is no shortage of ways the U.S. government can hurt you.
While a drone strike is unlikely (for now), the U.S. government would almost certainly cancel your U.S. passport and seize your U.S. bank accounts. Afghanistan Ethiopia Nepal Algeria Gabon Niger Andorra Guinea North Korea Angola Guinea-Bissau Oman Armenia Indonesia Qatar Bahrain Iran Russia Bangladesh Kazakhstan Rwanda Belarus Kosovo Samoa Bhutan Kuwait São Tomé & PrÃncipe Bosnia and Herzegovina Laos Saudi Arabia Brunei Lebanon Senegal Burkina Faso Libya Serbia Burundi Macedonia Somalia Cambodia Madagascar Sudan Cameroon the Maldives Syria Cape Verde Mali Taiwan the Central African Republic the Marshall Islands Togo Chad Mauritania Tunisia China Micronesia Uganda Comoros Moldova Ukraine Dem. Republic of the Congo Mongolia United Arab Emirates Cote d’ Ivoire Montenegro Uzbekistan Cuba Morocco Vanuatu Djibouti Mozambique the Vatican Equatorial Guinea Myanmar Vietnam Eritrea Namibia Yemen
I'm pretty sure he wanted to be "arrested" so that he could be put into the deep state's witness protection program. Pure speculation on my part.
(1) Not so, becuase at least here:
However, in this one, read carefully: "In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal objects thereof , the following overt act , among others , was committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere : in or about 2022 , SAMUEL BANKMAN - FRIED a/k/ a SBF ," the defendant , and one or more other conspirators agreed to and did make corporate contributions to candidates and committees in the Southern District of New York that were reported in the name of another person."
(2) THERE IS A SECOND SEALED INDICTMENT. **
SEALED INDICTMENT 22 . ( Title 7 , United States Code , Sections 9 1 ) and 13 ( a ) ( 5 ) ; Title 17 , Code of Federal Regulations , Section 180.1 Title 15, United States Code , Sections 78j ( b ) and 78ff Title 17 , Code of Federal Regulations , Section 240.10b - 5 ; Title 18 , United States Code , Sections 371, 1343, 1349, 1956, and 1957 Title 52, United States Code , Sections 30118 , 30122 and 30109 ( ) ( 1 ) (A ) & (D) . ) DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney A TRUE BILL Foreperson
(3) Not so becuase in para 19: It was a further part and object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN , / k/ a SBF , " the defendant , and others known and unknown , **would and did knowingly and willfully make contrib ions to candidates for federal office and joint fundraising committees by a corporation , aggregating to $ 25,000 and more in a calendar year , in violation of Title 52 , United States Code , Sections 30118 and 30109 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( A ) .
Might want to update your title it is misleading.
Would if I could. How would you like it re-worded?
FYI, It's the article title not mine.