The excess risk of car crash posed by unvaccinated drivers “exceeds the safety gains from modern automobile engineering advances and also imposes risks on other road users,” the authors wrote.
Of course, skipping a COVID vaccine does not mean that someone will get into a car crash. Instead, the authors theorize that people who resist public health recommendations might also “neglect basic road safety guidelines.”
Why would they ignore the rules of the road? Distrust of the government, a belief in freedom, misconceptions of daily risks, “faith in natural protection,” “antipathy toward regulation,” poverty, misinformation, a lack of resources, and personal beliefs are potential reasons proposed by the authors.
CONCLUSION:
If you reject the establishment narrative, you are a threat to everyone else.
"study" Bwahahahahhahahah. This is a theoretical attack job, that seeks to justify forcing people to inject the poison, accentuates the Cabal covid narrative that "anti-vaxxers" are a threat (aka DEMONIZATION of those who do not accept the narrative)
Nothing scientific or even statistical about this ....'study'.
“The findings suggest that unvaccinated adults need to be careful indoors with other people and outside with surrounding traffic,” the authors concluded.
They have pulled out ALL the stops on the IDIOCY level with this one, folks.
Abstract
Background
Coronavirus disease (COVID) vaccine hesitancy is a reflection of psychology that might also contribute to traffic safety. We tested whether COVID vaccination was associated with the risks of a traffic crash.
It would be easy to disprove this theory by looking at driving records of MAGA people prior to 2021. If their record was good prior to covid jabs, then the issue is not their personalities.
Seems to me there are a lot of factors that could influence this. For example, maybe the non-jabbed, those freedom loving, government distrusting vermin, travel more, because they don't buy into the "stay at home and be a mouse in a cell" narrative. Just as one example.
Couldn't be bothered (!) to really do a serious analysis of the study, but on the surface, it looks exactly like a project set up not to examine objectively, but to build a narrative towards a for-gone conclusion. Aka propaganda.
From the report:
CONCLUSION:
If you reject the establishment narrative, you are a threat to everyone else.
"study" Bwahahahahhahahah. This is a theoretical attack job, that seeks to justify forcing people to inject the poison, accentuates the Cabal covid narrative that "anti-vaxxers" are a threat (aka DEMONIZATION of those who do not accept the narrative)
Nothing scientific or even statistical about this ....'study'.
They have pulled out ALL the stops on the IDIOCY level with this one, folks.
https://fortune.com/well/2022/12/13/covid-unvaccinated-greater-risk-car-crash-traffic-accident-new-study-says-canada-government-records-pfizer-moderna/
Nonsense straight from the Matrix mouth:
If you're after laughs, or tears, take a read:
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#%20
Good post. Thanks.
It would be easy to disprove this theory by looking at driving records of MAGA people prior to 2021. If their record was good prior to covid jabs, then the issue is not their personalities.
Seems to me there are a lot of factors that could influence this. For example, maybe the non-jabbed, those freedom loving, government distrusting vermin, travel more, because they don't buy into the "stay at home and be a mouse in a cell" narrative. Just as one example.
Couldn't be bothered (!) to really do a serious analysis of the study, but on the surface, it looks exactly like a project set up not to examine objectively, but to build a narrative towards a for-gone conclusion. Aka propaganda.
I think you are right.