I'm flustered right now, so you guys are gonna have to deal with me just giving you the pieces, but this was too good to ignore.
Yoel Roth constantly uses underscores in his communications on Twitter's backend to emphasize things, as shown in the recent Twitter Files drops. Using this, we can even presume he's the person speaking even in some of these drops where the names are orange-barred out. His writing habits sorta give him away.
Some Examples:
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/1601746253284798469/photo/1
https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1602365655595962368/photo/1
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601359872528101376/photo/1
Well, what does that prove?
Considering the Yoel Roth Twitter Files content came out on Dec 10th-11th, it proves a lot considering a particular Q post during that same delta time frame in 2017:
Eerie how that lines up, aye? Files using that syntax come out on a Q delta of the same sentence structure.
Now, we also see a reference to owls, as well as Q unusually using underscores to emphasize text (Q usually uses [brackets] to indicate "targets" in speech).
But, where else did we see owls in the Twitter Files drops?
Oh yeah, that's right. Internal Twitter staff call themselves "Owls."
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598852182572298241
Now does post 328 make a lot more sense? Q was throwing shade at Yoel Roth all the way back in 2017.
Q, in December of 2017, was showing they had access to Twitter's back channels, particularly Yoel Roth, and were monitoring the internal conversations there.
Amazing...
It appears as though Post 328, with the underscores, was really Q mocking them for not being able to figure out how they can see the backend conversations. Patriots really do "have it all."
This post days prior indicates the Roth(s) may have included Yoel Roth and his under-stooges at Twitter (not just the Rothschilds) and other installed in various Social Media rackets such as Facebook(LifeLog).
I believe that Elon Musk's Twitter purchase is a pretense for merely showing files on the Twitter back-end that Trump and Frens have had access to for 4+ years now. Which may indicate that we are finally in the DECLAS phase, where the public can now learn of these events without threatening ongoing operations.
Due to Q's posts, it's evident that these communications have been visible to White Hats for YEARS and I think it's a safe hopium dose to assume the DeepState Cabal still, to this day, have no idea how White Hats can read their back-channels and not get caught doing so.
Tell me what you think.
In those Twitter links from the Roth chat logs, there are names with red squiggle underlines suggesting a misspelling, there is the name Roth actually highlighted in red, and then there is a blinking cursor text cursor below that. Does this make any sense? How could there be highlighted text and a blinking cursor at the same time?
Are these real-time screenshots that have been pasted together? Were the screenshots taken as the chat was happening live? Does it make sense that Twitter would store its own logs as a series of real-time screenshots, or does that look more like what the NSA would do?
Good catch.
I think there's a possibility that's the Journalists or Elon's data-miners handiwork. Remember, we're only getting screenshots; screenshots that could have been edited/condensed/redacted on some points where necessary.
Until we get the actual, bonafide files, we're left to assume any number of things. That the Twitter staff aren't refuting these claims on their authenticity, however, indicates they don't want to beat the hornets nest any more than necessary should they pursue defamation claims.
Everyone has reason to walk on egg shells right now, even Elon. Hell, if he finds a treasure trove of child porn ON TWITTER SERVERS and didn't immediately go to the police with it as soon as it's discovered, he could face charges.