And as always, remember that those who scream the loudest have the most to hide. So start there, work backwards, work forwards, work sideways.
There are skeletons in the closets of all these brainwashed attention whores, but they're really not as smart as their corrupt system told them they were (these people are stupid), and so even when they're not saying things explicitly, their volume and nonsense highlights them.
Here's looking at you Rob Reiner.
Jimmy Page actually bought Aleister Crowley's mansion and lived there during his Led Zeppelin days, at least that's what it says in Hammer of the Gods: The Led Zeppelin Saga.
The Beatles and Zeppelin and many others were specifically promoting Crowleyism under the guise of different states of "revolution" designed to appeal to different subsets of humanity, usually through dichotomies like "do you like Beatles or Zeppelin?", A pied piper approach of leading the youth astray via hypnotic music.
The Beatles from the outset were designed to lead people away from Christianity and invoked Crowley several times, and you could say that from their outset they were a Masonic psyop vehicle. Weird how the "peace and love" post-war shattered psyche easily got led into Hinduism and Buddhism.
Crowleyism is essentially a newer permutation of Ancient Egyptian occultism, a mutation of Masonic doctrines.
It has been said that the Beatles were created in large part by the Tavistock Institute, which of course has recently been in the news as an organisation mutating children under trans ideology.
the orgins of tavistock tell you exactly what they do...thought progamming through exposure and manipulation
"do you like Beatles or Zeppelin?" Actually I never heard that, but I did hear a lot of 'do you like the beatles or the beach boys?' Not saying you are wrong though, as this was early beatles, and zeppelin came along a few years later (68 I think). Also there is this song by George Harrison. Was he a believer? IDK https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/georgeharrison/awaitingonyouall.html
That's fascinating. Because the media wants everyone to remember the Crowley tinged Sgt Pepper India period, and always plays his My Sweet Lord song that he admitted starts with Hallelujah but transitions into Hare Krishna so that people don't even realise that they're being led in that direction.
So it's very intriguing that both were from the same album, could it be doing the same thing? That is, first it leads you in with Jesus but then tells you that you don't need the book or the words of the Bible, but then leads you into the notion that "chanting the names of the Lord" will lead you to Him, which is a very non-Christian concept?
Because the timeline is interesting; either he was having Christian leanings less than 4 years after Paul McCartney's Crowlean/Osiran sacrifice and replacement and the LSD brainwash trips in India where he became very influenced by Hinduism, or he was doing the exact same thing that he claimed he was doing in the contemporary song My Sweet Lord which is leading Christians astray from the Bible and reducing them to slavish repetitions of "The Lord's" various names and thus leading Christians into Hinduistic practices.
Yes, confusing indeed. Thanks for your input, very good points.