As a gamer of over 40 years, I don't understand the reasoning behind this. Sony was able to get Street Fighter V, s sequel toan extremely popular title with now 35 years of history, as an exclusive. They own many development houses, and have tons of exclusive titles, licenses. Seems kind of fishy...
There's lots to hate about Microsoft as a whole, historically speaking, but their gaming side of the house is NOT one of them. They've been a net positive force in the gaming world. They would most likely clean up Activision and the COD franchise quite nicely. Not sure why this gets the attention of the FTC...
As a gamer of over 40 years, I don't understand the reasoning behind this. Sony was able to get Street Fighter V, s sequel toan extremely popular title with now 35 years of history, as an exclusive. They own many development houses, and have tons of exclusive titles, licenses. Seems kind of fishy...
Exactly.
There's lots to hate about Microsoft as a whole, historically speaking, but their gaming side of the house is NOT one of them. They've been a net positive force in the gaming world. They would most likely clean up Activision and the COD franchise quite nicely. Not sure why this gets the attention of the FTC...
That is the $50 question...