In order to historically analyze the story about "Operation Reinhard," one must understand a bit about the methods behind the dark forces controlling the narrative, and use a bit of deductive reasoning. There are no such records of mass killings, no place to dispose of the bodies, or even means to kill that many people unnoticed. The numbers of those allegedly killed changes from account to account...some, as you say, describe 1.5 million, others say either "1.8 million" or "over 2 million," and yet others say, "800 thousand." Which is it? Are the claims no more precise than this? The method employed was "carbon monoxide poisoning from vehicle exhaust," but no credible description of how this was done logically.
All other stories of the holocaust have fallen apart, following court cases, forensic study, and interviews of individuals making such claims. Not one such claim can be verified...we are simply required to take someone's "word" that it actually happened, despite the evidence to the contrary that there was no sharp decline in the census of Jews living in Europe at the time. (As a matter of fact, they grew slightly in numbers.) Conveniently with the claims about Operation Reinhard, the evidence was "buried" by the Germans so that no one could discover the truth.
Some will point to the alleged "confessions" at the Nuremberg trials as evidence. However, when one understands the methods of torture utilized to extract said "confessions," one realizes that they are not confessions at all, but simply agreements from the prisoners to say whatever the torturers were claiming, to make the torture stop.
There is some question about disturbed soil at Treblinka, and the possibility of "mass graves." The fact that the people doing this study had to "sneak around" with ground penetrating radar, since they didn't have permission from museum officials, is a huge red flag. There may have been some unmarked graves at Treblinka, but not containing thousands of bodies. At that time in Europe, there was a typhus epidemic, and it was not prudent to bury diseased bodies since it would contaminate ground water. The crematoriums simply couldn't handle the volume of bodies claimed.
I could go on and on about this, as I'm a bit of a history buff of this period of time, and maintain a large file with good, solid historical research. I can't provide something about Operation Reinhard specifically (aside from all the propaganda that's already out there), but this video link does provide some good, anecdotal evidence of the grifters spreading the holocaust lies, beginning about 2:50 in: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9W7GyE84ngZf/ These people do not represent isolated cases.
I will close by saying that any "historian" claiming that any part of the holocaust is true, is a Zionist puppet, and not to be taken seriously. I would heartily debate that Irving is "...one of the best today." There is PLENTY of evidence to the contrary with respect to the holocaust, and as I said above, not one piece of historical evidence exists in support of the ridiculous claims. We can't parrot the claims as truth, without rigorously examining and weighing both sides. If we do not do this, we are simply doing the propagandists' work for them.
The entirety of the agenda, of which the holocaust is but one small piece, is part of a much larger plan -- a plan that is currently underway around the world. Hiding historical details is how the plan continues in operation, because exposing the truth of those historical elements will cause the whole thing to crumble.
In order to historically analyze the story about "Operation Reinhard," one must understand a bit about the methods behind the dark forces controlling the narrative, and use a bit of deductive reasoning. There are no such records of mass killings, no place to dispose of the bodies, or even means to kill that many people unnoticed. The numbers of those allegedly killed changes from account to account...some, as you say, describe 1.5 million, others say either "1.8 million" or "over 2 million," and yet others say, "800 thousand." Which is it? Are the claims no more precise than this? The method employed was "carbon monoxide poisoning from vehicle exhaust," but no credible description of how this was done logically.
All other stories of the holocaust have fallen apart, following court cases, forensic study, and interviews of individuals making such claims. Not one such claim can be verified...we are simply required to take someone's "word" that it actually happened, despite the evidence to the contrary that there was no sharp decline in the census of Jews living in Europe at the time. (As a matter of fact, they grew slightly in numbers.) Conveniently with the claims about Operation Reinhard, the evidence was "buried" by the Germans so that no one could discover the truth.
Some will point to the alleged "confessions" at the Nuremberg trials as evidence. However, when one understands the methods of torture utilized to extract said "confessions," one realizes that they are not confessions at all, but simply agreements from the prisoners to say whatever the torturers were claiming, to make the torture stop.
There is some question about disturbed soil at Treblinka, and the possibility of "mass graves." The fact that the people doing this study had to "sneak around" with ground penetrating radar, since they didn't have permission from museum officials, is a huge red flag. There may have been some unmarked graves at Treblinka, but not containing thousands of bodies. At that time in Europe, there was a typhus epidemic, and it was not prudent to bury diseased bodies since it would contaminate ground water. The crematoriums simply couldn't handle the volume of bodies claimed.
I could go on and on about this, as I'm a bit of a history buff of this period of time, and maintain a large file with good, solid historical research. I can't provide something about Operation Reinhard specifically (aside from all the propaganda that's already out there), but this video link does provide some good, anecdotal evidence of the grifters spreading the holocaust lies, beginning about 2:50 in: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9W7GyE84ngZf/ These people do not represent isolated cases.
I will close by saying that any "historian" claiming that any part of the holocaust is true, is a Zionist puppet, and not to be taken seriously. I would heartily debate that Irving is "...one of the best today." There is PLENTY of evidence to the contrary with respect to the holocaust, and as I said above, not one piece of historical evidence exists in support of the ridiculous claims. We can't parrot the claims as truth, without rigorously examining and weighing both sides. If we do not do this, we are simply doing the propagandists' work for them.
The entirety of the agenda, of which the holocaust is but one small piece, is part of a much larger plan -- a plan that is currently underway around the world. Hiding historical details is how the plan continues in operation, because exposing the truth of those historical elements will cause the whole thing to crumble.