What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
I have listened an d learnt..I am not the one trying to pass toxins off as viruses
Okay, lets play this game. You claim there are no viruses. Prove to me that no one has synthesized viruses (not toxins, but actual viruses) in the lab.
That's funny because I was thinking of this when I woke this morning and decided to ask you what toxins you refer to that presumably you say are like viruses in that you contend they are contagious as you say viruses are.
There is a very large sum of money..think it's a million dollars for anyone who can produce one and up to date no one has come to claim the money.
Over 200 countries were asked to show evidence of a virus including CDC UK Ireland Canada etc etc. None have produced one ..even court cases brought against the mandates still no virus produced.
Dr Robert young naturapath has evidence in writing from CDC and all the other countries that they could not produce a virus.
There is a great deal of evidence out there to show viruses are not contagious and gross tests were done in 1918 on volunteers to show people could not catch the so called Spanish flu..Jenner lying about his smallpox etc as his diaries showed and that smallpox only ended when the government stopped jabbing people with the toxins in the jabs in Leicester town UK
I could go on all day.
what is being called a virus is just human tissue cells which are not contagious and if you have understood that they never ever put a snot sample on a slide and point out the virus and this is because it's just deceased human tissue cells..
So please show me the evidence of contagious toxins?
If you are referring to spike proteins..please show me how these are contagious
The reason I object to your saying they have invented a toxin that is contagious and why you say so why not call it a virus is it's not the truth.
CDC say they don't have any evidence of a virus for ANY so called virus.andvneithervhas any other country. This is because it's just human tissue cells
the public have been trained since birth that vaccines containing viruses will stop you catching say the flu or ebola or hiv or any other scam disease caused by the cabal with the ingredients in thecjab...So much so that even when they get I'll or have a heart attack or go blind or have foot long blood clots pulled from their veins they say good job I had the vaxx it would have been much worse
They have not been brainwashed to regards toxins in the same way..which is why the cabal pretended it was a virus..even altering the description of a virus in Webster's dictionary to make it a vaccine which it is not
Just what is your motive in pushing this? ...you talk about layers to the truth? The truth is the truth. It has no layers.
Why does a moderator on great awakening want to perpetuate the Rockefellers/Rothschilds/Carnegie fraud?
People who are making these claims have to show the evidence and they cannot do it
A string of computer coding of what a virus could look like if there was such a thing that was handed over from Wuhan chief epidemiologist to wellcome trust UK as stated on national television is no evidence of a virus
I do hope you ldont wipe this
What you have proven is "No one has isolated a virus in nature". That is the truth and anyone who claims otherwise is lying.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. So, when you say "Viruses do not exist" that is an opinion based on the previous fact. It may be an informed opinion but it's still not a fact. Hence anyone not saying "Viruses do not exist" is not lying. They are simply keeping quiet about an opinion (that may very well be true, but still an opinion).
I hope you understand this point, because this logical distinctions i very important before you start accusing anyone of not telling the truth.
Further to these two points, the third point is: There could be man made "virus" that was created in the lab. This is a hypothesis. This is what I asked you to disprove, but you did not. You only talked about natural virus but did not even try to address my real question.
This is definitely mod grief because you are accusing me of something I never said. However, it only shows your ignorance, and lack of understanding of the complexity of this issue, so I will leave it here.
I have tried to explain to the very best, the difference between the three statements:
At this point there is nothing further I have to add to you.
There is no natural virus either.
I had just found the evidence you asked for..new .German medicine and epigentics have the evidence
You wouldn't want this on truth will set you free . Bitchute spacebusters biochemistry debunks religion freemasonry and chicken pox..(as well as all others,..cancers etc )
Disease is an electrical imbalance . I regularly post prof Michael Levin showing that every cell in our body has its own consciousness and independent life but cooperate with other cells to make say a hand organ eye. All that is needed to cure anyone of anything is an adjustment in electricity to the relevant cells ...
Prof Levin shows the proof of this ..showing cells..how they grow ..all in the lab. They know how to grow teeth..cure cancer etc.
As the Buddha said what we think we become.
If you believe a virus will give you skin bumps ..it will.
I hope you are open minded enough to watch the video.
This is the great awakening
we live in a construct..science has already made biospheres like this world only a lot smaller.of course.
People are dying cos of what's in the jab.....and they take the jab in their belief that there are viruses that can kill them
.
If you have listened and learnt you will udnerstand that the only true statement you can make is:
"No one has ever isolated a virus in nature"
Anything you say beyond that is not the truth.