Whatever it was, it isn't now... Unless what it is now is what it always was.
This site has plenty of bread concerning the elitists blood cults, and we know celebrities are their mockingbirds. Foreskins, and placentas, are being sold by hospitals to the pharmaceutical and beauty industries for their stem cells and fibroblasts. Rich old ladies are rubbing pulverized foreskin on their faces.. There's the ritual the unaware are advocating for. Not too far from adrenochrome in my opinion.
Q told us we're fighting against a 6000 year old blood cult.. Making baby boys bleed by cutting off the most sensitive parts of their penises was either hijacked and distorted into what it is today, or this is what it always was.
If a parent wants to advocate for circumcision, fine, but they should be the cutter, so at least they know Oprah isn't going to make a profit selling foreskin facial creams to Sandra Bullock.
You misunderstand and I agree with your points. It has been turned into a sick business. My comment was not meant to be taken as an approval of a practice that has very significant religious significance to Jews. Jewish circumcision is not done in hospital. It is a religious ritual that is performed by a person specifically trained for this rite and is done either in synagogue or in a home. The medical community or any of their blood cult sick financial interests are no where to be seen. My point was that whatever reasons people use to circumcise their children, unless they are Jewish it should not have any religious significance placed upon it to somehow give it some validity.
No problem fren. There is so much misunderstanding about this topic. I spend a great deal of time trying to educate Christians on what they think their Bibles say versus what it actually does say within its appropriate historical and cultural context. I had to spend many years of study and learn the languages just to find out for myself what it actually says. Most people are actually pretty pissed when they find out about the level of misinterpretation that has been spun throughout the centuries for geopolitical and cultural control. These texts don't exactly translate in English well - or another other language for that matter. Lots of translation bias for sure. Thanks for the discourse.
Whatever it was, it isn't now... Unless what it is now is what it always was.
This site has plenty of bread concerning the elitists blood cults, and we know celebrities are their mockingbirds. Foreskins, and placentas, are being sold by hospitals to the pharmaceutical and beauty industries for their stem cells and fibroblasts. Rich old ladies are rubbing pulverized foreskin on their faces.. There's the ritual the unaware are advocating for. Not too far from adrenochrome in my opinion.
Q told us we're fighting against a 6000 year old blood cult.. Making baby boys bleed by cutting off the most sensitive parts of their penises was either hijacked and distorted into what it is today, or this is what it always was.
If a parent wants to advocate for circumcision, fine, but they should be the cutter, so at least they know Oprah isn't going to make a profit selling foreskin facial creams to Sandra Bullock.
You misunderstand and I agree with your points. It has been turned into a sick business. My comment was not meant to be taken as an approval of a practice that has very significant religious significance to Jews. Jewish circumcision is not done in hospital. It is a religious ritual that is performed by a person specifically trained for this rite and is done either in synagogue or in a home. The medical community or any of their blood cult sick financial interests are no where to be seen. My point was that whatever reasons people use to circumcise their children, unless they are Jewish it should not have any religious significance placed upon it to somehow give it some validity.
I liked the line about Oprah and Bullock.
Yup, I did misunderstand, apologies.
And I also agree with you about the medical vs religious ritual. It's a great point to bring up for Christians to think about.
No problem fren. There is so much misunderstanding about this topic. I spend a great deal of time trying to educate Christians on what they think their Bibles say versus what it actually does say within its appropriate historical and cultural context. I had to spend many years of study and learn the languages just to find out for myself what it actually says. Most people are actually pretty pissed when they find out about the level of misinterpretation that has been spun throughout the centuries for geopolitical and cultural control. These texts don't exactly translate in English well - or another other language for that matter. Lots of translation bias for sure. Thanks for the discourse.