Ya I saw that. If that is the best she's got, its a problem. No judge is going to abide by the law and throw out hundreds of thousands of ballots without some kind of evidence that they were unlawfully cast on some other basis besides lack of chain of custody. They should throw them out for that. But they won't because it will be viewed as some miniscule technical violation. Even though the statutes must be strictly complied with. Hopefully, the attorney(s) tell the judge that he would not be disenfranchising anyone in such a case. The people who disenfranchised lawful voters are the asshats that failed to maintain required chain of custody documents that are for purposes of securing the election.

There needs to be proof of a number of votes injected in this manner that are not real voters casting real votes which exceed the margin of victory. If she can demonstrate that, she's golden. If not, be prepared for a judge to find that this was violated but wouldn't be willing to do anything about it without more.