A read through their content shows the contract and the date alright.
My question at this juncture would be: by WHAT instrument is the contract created, signed and executed? (What determines what the "action date" is?)
Yes, the info in the listing reads as reported, but what determines those dates? If it is executed via a piece of legislation, that would be an important piece of the puzzle.
It provides some promising starting points, I would say.
Looking legit and being legit, however, are completely different things, right? How long did so much of our world look ..... legit?
Over the last 5 years, I've seen more than one occasion where something was presented as a massive smoking gun, only to turn out to be all smoke and no gun, once you dig and scratch the surface.
Thus, I tend to err on the side of scepticism when something that looks too good to be true (from a conspiracy theorist's perspective) comes out.
Until it is proven, I tend to think: it's not proven. A curious paradox, perhaps, because there are certainly numerous convictions and beliefs I certain hold to be true, even though they aren't 'proven'.
Guess I just think, if more of us were a lot more skeptical with info, we'd have a LOT more solid evidence and less noise to our collective voices.
It's good to be skeptical. I am the doubting Thomas. I tend to not believe until there's a lot more info coming and proving but I also look at stuffs critically.
When I saw this, I also remember the shipping of the testing kits prior to outbreak.
Then there's the patent in Netherland for Covid Test Kit by guess who, somebody child that rhyme with Yoel (Twitter). That's when I said, yeah, it's all planned.
You do that.
A read through their content shows the contract and the date alright.
My question at this juncture would be: by WHAT instrument is the contract created, signed and executed? (What determines what the "action date" is?)
Yes, the info in the listing reads as reported, but what determines those dates? If it is executed via a piece of legislation, that would be an important piece of the puzzle.
The biological threat reduction contract >>> Ukraine (2018) looks pretty interesting, tho.
I thought it looks legit.
It provides some promising starting points, I would say.
Looking legit and being legit, however, are completely different things, right? How long did so much of our world look ..... legit?
Over the last 5 years, I've seen more than one occasion where something was presented as a massive smoking gun, only to turn out to be all smoke and no gun, once you dig and scratch the surface.
Thus, I tend to err on the side of scepticism when something that looks too good to be true (from a conspiracy theorist's perspective) comes out.
Until it is proven, I tend to think: it's not proven. A curious paradox, perhaps, because there are certainly numerous convictions and beliefs I certain hold to be true, even though they aren't 'proven'.
Guess I just think, if more of us were a lot more skeptical with info, we'd have a LOT more solid evidence and less noise to our collective voices.
But, I'm rambling on.
Good post.
It's good to be skeptical. I am the doubting Thomas. I tend to not believe until there's a lot more info coming and proving but I also look at stuffs critically.
When I saw this, I also remember the shipping of the testing kits prior to outbreak.
https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215
Then there's the patent in Netherland for Covid Test Kit by guess who, somebody child that rhyme with Yoel (Twitter). That's when I said, yeah, it's all planned.