The Ukrainian propaganda has been confirmed as lies, frauds, hoaxes, ever since the start of this battle. The U.S. refuses to criticize or distance itself from it. Neither does the U.K., which is implicated in the staging of some of it (the Bucha "massacre" for instance). The Russians, on the other hand, have not been exposed as lying. And they don't make absurd claims, they just report from the field with photographic coverage.
The real questions is, why do you trust Western/Ukrainian propaganda that has been shown repeatedly and continually to be a tissue of lies? Your discernment is nonexistent. And you have no sense of what is happening on the battlefield (Russia takes, holds, liberates, and incorporates 20% of Ukraine and you say they "underperform"...).
I fold in with analysis by Col. Douglas MacGregor, Scott Ritter, Gonzalo Lira, Patrick Lancaster and others. The only ones disappointed are the Ukrainians, who have seen hundreds of thousands of troops dead, all for the sake of punishing Russia on the U.S.A.'s behalf. It is an absolute bloodbath. The forests of flags flown over clogged Ukrainian cemeteries is a doleful sight---which you are no doubt sparing yourself, because the Russians "dramatically underperform."
You might specify them. I notice you have nothing to say against their information and assessment of events. My background includes military operations analysis. Are you swallowing the Ukraine Kool-Aid? If you are, you have zero credibility with me and no stature from which to look down on MacGregor.
You may not wake up until the UAF is completely annihilated and the Russians are besieging Kiev. U.S. families will start asking why their secret ops husbands and sons went to Ukraine to die.
The Ukrainian propaganda has been confirmed as lies, frauds, hoaxes, ever since the start of this battle. The U.S. refuses to criticize or distance itself from it. Neither does the U.K., which is implicated in the staging of some of it (the Bucha "massacre" for instance). The Russians, on the other hand, have not been exposed as lying. And they don't make absurd claims, they just report from the field with photographic coverage.
The real questions is, why do you trust Western/Ukrainian propaganda that has been shown repeatedly and continually to be a tissue of lies? Your discernment is nonexistent. And you have no sense of what is happening on the battlefield (Russia takes, holds, liberates, and incorporates 20% of Ukraine and you say they "underperform"...).
I fold in with analysis by Col. Douglas MacGregor, Scott Ritter, Gonzalo Lira, Patrick Lancaster and others. The only ones disappointed are the Ukrainians, who have seen hundreds of thousands of troops dead, all for the sake of punishing Russia on the U.S.A.'s behalf. It is an absolute bloodbath. The forests of flags flown over clogged Ukrainian cemeteries is a doleful sight---which you are no doubt sparing yourself, because the Russians "dramatically underperform."
Ritter and Mcgregor continue to embarrass themselves and make unfulfilled prediction after prediction.
You’ll wake up soon enough.
You might specify them. I notice you have nothing to say against their information and assessment of events. My background includes military operations analysis. Are you swallowing the Ukraine Kool-Aid? If you are, you have zero credibility with me and no stature from which to look down on MacGregor.
You may not wake up until the UAF is completely annihilated and the Russians are besieging Kiev. U.S. families will start asking why their secret ops husbands and sons went to Ukraine to die.