I believe the summary is misleading. It states, "30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant". But the chart clearly shows that not getting the jab is even more effective. Perhaps the authors though this was the only way they could get this published. You can find the chart at the end of the report.
"Getting covid" despite being vaxx'ed is NOT a side effect. It is a FEATURE of the jab. Get those unknown chemicals, mRNA spike proteins, and junk into your veins so when you inevitably get exposed to covid or the flu or just about anything, and you'll be defenseless against it.
The only scary thing about this is not knowing how lethal the NEXT disease they are going to unleash on us will be.
So it is effective in its intended purpose.
Source: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf
How does your title match what the document is saying?
I believe the summary is misleading. It states, "30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant". But the chart clearly shows that not getting the jab is even more effective. Perhaps the authors though this was the only way they could get this published. You can find the chart at the end of the report.
Yeah I was trying to make sense out of it. I will look at it closer after work.
"Getting covid" despite being vaxx'ed is NOT a side effect. It is a FEATURE of the jab. Get those unknown chemicals, mRNA spike proteins, and junk into your veins so when you inevitably get exposed to covid or the flu or just about anything, and you'll be defenseless against it.
The only scary thing about this is not knowing how lethal the NEXT disease they are going to unleash on us will be.
And yet governments continue to advertise to get the clot shot on radio and TV. Using our tax money.
Oh, the irony... safe and effective. My ass.