AZ HEADS UP BOOOOOMM!!!19 INCH IMAGE ON 20 INCH BALLOT.....expert witness just TORPEDOES recorder testimony!!! Holy Shit
🌵 RHINOS IN AZ 🌵
Get ready folks its about to get crazy
Were the 19” ballots designed to: A) throughout Lake votes in R districts B) count Lake votes for Hobbs C) both A snd B
The duplicate ballots that come up from a rejected ballot are supposed to be the same, but there is no way to verify that, since the ballots could not be compared to one another.
My guess, the ballots were 'cured' by the software to say a rejection is a vote for a certain person, its a way to cover the fraud in a computer error. This was written in the BIOS. No way around it now, the steal was written into the voting software.
Interesting re bios theory. Might be easier by party (aka Dem) rather than name. But the bios could be easily checked for this.
Find the duplication number from election day and find the adjudication number from election day. Together, it may very well exceed the total number of votes cast on election day. But for sure it will be more than half of the votes.
I don't think that they did this for purposes of causing havoc at polling stations. I think they did it for purposes of sending more likely than not Lake votes to adjudication instead of adjudicating redundant Hobbs votes. This is more efficient and would not create absurd turnout numbers as crazy amounts of total votes in the system need to be increased in order to ratio Hobbs over the line. Why adjudicate a Hobbs vote when that doesn't help you rig?
Fraud always follows the same basic MO. Shave down the margin, delay, and stuff in phony ballots. The 19" ballots were meant to be rejected by the tabulators thus shaving down the margin.
Dont forget MANUAL ADJUDICATION. (change vote by machine)
One thing that prompts MANUEL ADJUDICATION is a bleed thru from the other side. For example, if one were to fill out a ballot with a Sharpie/marker it would bleed thru to the other side. When the scanner notices a mark where there is not supposed to be, caused by the bleed thru, it does not accept it and sends it to adjudication. This is thru the scanner/computer which sends it to an actual human that is then able to "correct" the error. Which then they can change in their favor Fun fact: when I voted in the 2020 election the ONLY option that was given at my location were Sharpie's. It wasn't until after the Election that I realized what they did