Q asks, "Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself?"
People like to say Military Tribunals are for the military personnel and can't be used against civilians. You would be mistaken.
“Can military law apply to civilians?” The short answer is yes, but only under special circumstances."
As we continue to read here, those circumstances would be if President Trump signed the Insurrection Act.
https://www.lawsuitlegal.com/military-law/can-civilians-be-tried-in-military-court.php
The Insurrection Act is a law while "martial law" is a concept that doesn't have a legal definition in the U.S. "It's not enshrined anywhere," said Thaddeus Hoffmeister, a law professor at the University of Dayton.
Generally, martial law means that the military takes over civilian control of the government, whereas the Insurrection Act applies to specific instances of rebellion or refusal to uphold the law and requires a state's National Guard or the U.S. military to intervene.
Looking at the section above it says, "Insurrection Act applies to specific instances of rebellion or refusal to uphold the law and requires a state's National Guard or the U.S. military to intervene.
On January 6th, there was a refusal to uphold the law. The law broken would be refusing to look at alternate delegates. This is what the Brunson Supreme Court case is based on.
Also said above, "Requires National Guard to intervene"
When did the National Guard arrive to DC? On the evening of Jan 6th.
https://people.com/politics/national-guard-arrives-on-scene-at-u-s-capitol/
For Trump to initiate the Insurrection act, he must give a proclamation to disperse.
Here is his proclamation.
https://twitter.com/munson_fletcher/status/1604911237896491008
THE ROLE OF MILITARY TRIBUNALS UNDER THE LAW OF WAR
Go to page 7.
Under Article 2 of the Uniform Code, a “declared war” is necessary for a “time of war” to exist (which would then justify the trial of civilians by general court-martial)
https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/international/volume24n1/documents/1-14.pdf
Here, President Trump calls himself a war time President, "In a true sense, We Are At War". This is a war declaration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOe4Ksoa5bk
"Military authority takes over civilian rule upon the declaration of martial law. As a result, the military holds immense power to run essential branches of the State, including the police, courts, and legislature or any lawmaking body."
It does not matter what the committee investigating Jan. 6 finds. The recommended criminal charges going to the DOJ against President Donald Trump are null and void. The marker that pushes the military to step forward may be the attempt to arrest President Trump.
We have been waiting for Durham to issue his findings. If we are under martial law, he most likely handed his findings to a military tribunal. Durham just gathered the evidence; military tribunals will prosecute the guilty. Would it make any sense for Durham to hand his recommended criminal charges to the DOJ? At this stage of the movie, the military has overruled the DOJ's authority.
Elon is releasing evidence that solidifies the Durham's special counsel findings. The FBI colluded with the DNC's fake Russia collusion story (Durham) and now the FBI colluded social networking sites to infringe our rights and manipulate the outcome of our 2020 election. (Musk)
You can bet your sweet little ass Trump signed the Insurrection Act on January 6th. We are under martial law, just wait for it, its coming.
Remember this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YnMaAsiXIo
Have a Merry Christmas my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
Sorry, but martial law is not something we should be WANTING to be under. No thanks! If we are under any kind of marital law, we are fucked, and the Govt wouldnt give up that power. Both sides are too corrupt; the swamp is on BOTH sides.
The military approached Trump and asked him to run for president. Why would the military put an honorable man in office if their plan was to destroy us? If the military was a evil entity they would let Hillary win the 2016 election. Have you watched "Q's plan to save the world"? This was a video that came out about the same time Q started posting. It tells you about the good people working to save our nation.
https://rumble.com/v1x614u-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world.html
And do you mean the same military that has been injecting woke gender and DEI ideology into their training and standards? The same military has weakened enlistment standards for a very long time, year after year, in order to not only have a weakened military but also to have that military filled with people who commit acts of crime such as rape on fellow servicemembers and the same military that has been sweeping it all under the rug? The military that conducted experimental testing on its own people who have been willing to give up their lives to defend this nation? The same military has pushed unnecessary vaccines for a VERY long time, resulting in numerous medical conditions for many, just to have the VA claim as "not service related"? The same military that has been sending over soldiers to fight in numerous wars and battles across the world, ones that are instigated by and funded by on BOTH sides by the very same people?
The military did not approach Trump; some IN the military did.
The same military that has been sitting by allowing numerous crimes by very high ranking people in its branches and even within Fed and State Govt positions who have gone unchecked for a VERY LONG TIME?
Or are you speaking of another country's military?
I am not holding my breath on the United States military......
That video has been out for a long time now. We are waiting for arrests. We already know that they supposedly "Have it all" by now but other than rubbing that info in both sides' faces, now what???