Kek. After dumping all over Keep the Faith for by and large saying exactly this: "Pro tip for the future: Read first, then comment." you go around and say the same thing!
Lol. It's completely unnecessary, unproductive and not helpful. I strongly urge keeping such unsolicited advice to one's self. But maybe that's just me.
now, to the substance of your comment.
As I wrote in the comment above in a separate branch of the thread,
CQ, are you making the assertion that PP's theorizings are all 100% correct? Because he's been mistaken on certain things, which he admits himself.
PP's Opinion: "I don’t think he ever “left”...He is still President, and we’re in a state of devolution at the moment."
I stated that "Devolution EQUALS Trump is still president" is incorrect. In other words one does NOT equal the other.
Devolution = the possibility that Trump is still president is a correct statement, imo.
Also, devolution = the possibility that there is no president currently is also correct.
As far as I understand Dev theory. I base this view in large part on commentary by PP himself in discussions with other anons, and discussions by other anons of devolution theory.
While I think that PP's dev theory is probably the best developed Dev theory out there, it's a theory, and what that theory says ABOUT devolution should NOT be taken as fact, as in "Devolution = Fact".
That's how I see it, anyway.
you get corrected but not flamed. I think that's only fair.
yeah, nah. Save the self-aggrandizing commentary for others. I'm not really interested. I'm interested in ideas and discussion, but not personality-based competitions.
Kek. After dumping all over Keep the Faith for by and large saying exactly this: "Pro tip for the future: Read first, then comment." you go around and say the same thing!
Lol. It's completely unnecessary, unproductive and not helpful. I strongly urge keeping such unsolicited advice to one's self. But maybe that's just me.
now, to the substance of your comment.
As I wrote in the comment above in a separate branch of the thread,
PP's Opinion: "I don’t think he ever “left”...He is still President, and we’re in a state of devolution at the moment."
I stated that "Devolution EQUALS Trump is still president" is incorrect. In other words one does NOT equal the other.
Devolution = the possibility that Trump is still president is a correct statement, imo.
Also, devolution = the possibility that there is no president currently is also correct.
As far as I understand Dev theory. I base this view in large part on commentary by PP himself in discussions with other anons, and discussions by other anons of devolution theory.
While I think that PP's dev theory is probably the best developed Dev theory out there, it's a theory, and what that theory says ABOUT devolution should NOT be taken as fact, as in "Devolution = Fact".
That's how I see it, anyway.
yeah, nah. Save the self-aggrandizing commentary for others. I'm not really interested. I'm interested in ideas and discussion, but not personality-based competitions.