MC already admitted intent with the statement about the techs changing the printer settings. Those settings were changed intentionally.
Was it enough to change the results? They admitted 1300 ballots affected in 3 locations but we know for a fact there were at least 6 locations affected.
What if 60 locations were affected? That's a potential 26000 ballots.
That's not taking into account those that gave up and went home due to the backlog caused.
MC already admitted intent with the statement about the techs changing the printer settings. Those settings were changed intentionally.
Was it enough to change the results? They admitted 1300 ballots affected in 3 locations but we know for a fact there were at least 6 locations affected.
What if 60 locations were affected? That's a potential 26000 ballots.
That's not taking into account those that gave up and went home due to the backlog caused.
You see the problem?
How many voting locations reported issues?
In addition, it was 100% of the locations they were allowed to sample.