Texas Businessman Testifies That Bank Tried to Use His Loan Application to Coerce Him to Publicly Promote ESG Ideology
A bank tried to use his loan application as leverage to coerce him into publicly expressing support for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ideology, businessman Bud Brigham alleged in testimony at a Texas Senate Committee on State Affairs hearing.
The ESG scheme, which originates from Klaus Schwabb's WEF, stands for 'Environmental, Societal, and Governance. It has been Black Rock and Vanguard, et. al. dictating ESG policy to corporations using coercive leveraging through finance, especially through what I believe is Payroll lending, that have herded corporations in following these ESG policies.
'Governance' has never been the role of businesses. It has nothing to do with a corporation's bottom line; profitability. They have no right in dictating government matters that affect the rights of individuals and not their business. Government holds the monopoly on 'governance'. It is stunning that it was allowed to go this far. I believe we will find that BlackRock, Vanguard, and others were behind the corporate mandatory vax☠xine agenda. It wasn't the federal government mandating this because the federal government didn't have constitutional jurisdiction to do so. There was never an EO in the federal registry for corporations of 200 or more to get the 'COVID' vax☠xine jab. Biden only mentioned this in a speech he gave. So who was the hidden force behind the scenes driving this agenda that so many companies made this policy? I believe it was BlackRock, Vanguard, and a few others.
The article above, to which the TX businessman testified, only confirms what I believed to be happening. Hopefully, more will follow.
Are they circling the wagons? What depth of influence did they have driving ESG? Was there blackmail to companies to mandate the clot shot? Would that be corporate loans tied to certain dictates?
This is great insight! I've been trying to reason through why a high tech company like mine would risk driving away good people in a tight labor market with the forced jab. Indeed, the entire mandate platter. You make a great case for who has the kind of leverage to be able to stick it to the multinationals.
A thought I had, which could be a contributing factor, is the fact that corporations can buy acceptance of any questionable practice, and even get a free pass for providing substandard products and services by be sufficiently woke. Or at least they think they can. Some are seeing through that, and that shield is rapidly losing its plating.
....bastards....