AAAA!! They've taken the lobby and are on their way up the elevator! THIS "HOLIDAY SEASON," send a special Christmas message to the shills, tards, and other assets of the "Ukrainian Dawn Movement" by remaining calm and pressing the DEPORT button! ❤️—your mods 😎🎄
(media.greatawakening.win)
Yippee-ki-yay, motherfuckers! 🎄
I think pushing for Texas to leave the Union and then them actually leaving would be easier and more effective than a Civil War. If other States followed, it would neutralize much of D.C.’s power, and it would all be done formally and legally, with votes and documents. This would also maintain supply chains and keep the country/economy generally running to prevent outside invasion. There would likely be pushback and conflict, but more than a Civil War?
I have thought about secession. What would happen with military capability though? Say if 2 or 5 or 10 states lawfully voted to leave the union, would they need to start a military coalition or would existing branch resources move over to them?
Formally speaking, the US government claims secession isn't allowed. Therefore, they'd continue to claim authority over the troops stationed in the seceding states.
What really matters is whether the rank and file living in seceding states recognize the validity of the secession. If the substantial majority do, and the dissenting minority of troops are offered the choice between joining the seceding state's New military, leaving the service and entering civilian life, or moving to a different state, it would likely go peacefully.
If most of the military found the secession illegitimate, then a new union among the seceding states, forming a new military, would be necessary as a deterrent against invasion.