The confusion stems from the confused Pauline notion of “faith” and what it means in relation to God (singular) the possessor of infinite attributes to the infinite degree who then must be both transcendent to this material creation yet also immanent within it without contradiction. Pauline doctrine stresses blind faith in the Divine even in the face of contradictory evidence whereas Christ himself and every Christ tradition before Christ stressed faith through experience of the Divine and the entire tradition was based on the Disciple pr acting very specifically and under guidance of a Pastor such that they could experience that faith for themselves and thus have no doubts. Otherwise we run into the awkward situation of both epistemology and theodicy in which the atheists accuse us of being anti rational and sentimental as there is no way we can claim one belief is higher than another without epistemology and then without solving the theodicy issue we cannot rationally have any claim to Justice.

These issues have all been dealt with but atheists, being servants of darkness, would like to pretend otherwise and keep pushing this weakened idea that Christ taught Pauline and not Paleo Christianity to philosophically rot his teachings from the inside out and rob Christ’s Divine followers of their perfect Philosophical heritage. True religion and study of such should not be thought of as “theological” but instead be perfectly rational and thus philosophical even though we understand that when it comes to love of God at some eventual point very high up in the process of attaining this Philosophy herself is lower than Love of God.