Well they didn't change the rules, aka the law, properly. Only the legislature may do that. If the law doesn't allow for acceptance of chain of custody without a physical signature, and they went ahead and did so anyway, that's illegal.
So the judge made a bad call. That's why there's an appeal process.
Don't waste money on the appeal process. Put it into removing scanners from the process entirely instead. One avenue could actually reach somewhere. This legal avenue has run its course.
Well gee that would be nice, wouldn't it. If only there was a way to force that to happen through the legal system since, you know, it's the government and all.
Removing scanners could be done via ballot initiative. This Lake thing has run aground and has no hope. They put up a bad offense. Time to try a different tack, and not get all your money Cyber Ninja'd away again
As long as they changed the rules properly, yes. That's how the legal system works. Sorry you thought justice was involved?
Well they didn't change the rules, aka the law, properly. Only the legislature may do that. If the law doesn't allow for acceptance of chain of custody without a physical signature, and they went ahead and did so anyway, that's illegal.
So the judge made a bad call. That's why there's an appeal process.
Don't waste money on the appeal process. Put it into removing scanners from the process entirely instead. One avenue could actually reach somewhere. This legal avenue has run its course.
Well gee that would be nice, wouldn't it. If only there was a way to force that to happen through the legal system since, you know, it's the government and all.
Oh wait, that's exactly what's happening.
Removing scanners could be done via ballot initiative. This Lake thing has run aground and has no hope. They put up a bad offense. Time to try a different tack, and not get all your money Cyber Ninja'd away again