Your Alt-Reality Is Boring......A plea for more interesting alt-realities than the Moon Landing Hoax, Flat Earth, and No Virus.
(barsoom.substack.com)
** THERE WILL BE A QUIZ **
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (257)
sorted by:
NVM that you can take the "earthrise on the moon" photo adjust the levels and the photoshopping (manual equivalent) sticks out like a thumb (we know where they allegedly landed and we only ever see the same face of the moon, therefore the earth would always be near perpendicular from the surface from that location).
Which itself doesn't mean that the whole moon landing was fake, I had believed that they faked images to conceal the actual technologies involved for a long while.
Edit: Lots of downvotes on this, but ignores the fact that the earth always sees the same face of the moon, meaning there is NO EARTH RISING on the moon, the earth would be stationary from the moon perspective and relative to the position on the moon where people landed. Can any of the downvoters explain why they expect a surface that always faces towards the earth would see the earth moving in the sky? Not that the moon wouldn't have a day/night cycle, but that the earth should be anything but stationary from that perspective?
If the earth is sonhuge next to the moon why is it always tiny in the pics? Standing on the moon the earth should dwarf the viewer.
I believe this would be correct, if the moon is some 200k miles away and the earth is some x larger than the earth, then yes. it should be larger from the moon perspective too.
It takes about five seconds of research to find out that the famous Earthrise photo was taken while in orbit around the moon, and not from the surface.
That's a different photo. The blackness in that photo is because they turned the lights off in the ship, not space.
A different photo than what? I'm just pointing out that when Apollo 8 took a photo of the Earth rising up past the Moons horizon, it did so while orbiting the moon. Apollo 8 did not land on the part of the Moon where the Earth would be overhead, because it never landed on the Moon.
Which is the photo you are talking about with the impossible earthrise?
I'll put it this way, there are no photos that aren't composites or misrepresentation that can be spotted with forensic analysis of the images.
That also applies for ALL versions of the "blue marble" images, NASA admits they are composites (which is obvious when you compare the different versions of them and see they are not even consistent on land mass sizes.)
Same answer. Tje earth didn't get smaller because they werent on the surface.
You're forgetting that the earth is spinning on its axis as well as rotating around the sun.
GIF
No, it's accepting that, the model presented in that GIF SHOULD have the moon rotating around the earth on the same axis as the north-south geologic pole. That pole is 23.4° North (66.6 degrees from the equator).
The important point is that we ALWAYS, for the entire recorded history, has the moon pointing a constant face towards the earth. 1 rotation of the moon = 1 rotation of the moon around the earth. (Unless you get into some more obscure references that claim the moon was placed in its position and prior to that the earth did not have a moon)
We are in a construct....a simulation...