1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a good interview from 1965 where he goes into great detail about his inspiration for the story.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-mLVVJkH7I

4
RisingTidePod 4 points ago +5 / -1

Why introduce obsolete English verbiage that has nothing to do with the original writings?

Because that's the version that is public domain. They don't have to pay to use it.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would he post it on a public forum with millions of followers, if he could instead just send a text or make a phone call?

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, they would be child porn if the only part he got on video was the actual rape portion. You know, the part he says he was tied down for.

Like, he didn't get any other video evidence of the situation? Maybe when he wasn't tied down?

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how they write prices in India.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

The link you just posted here clearly says the 80% is a false statement (it's #11 in the true/false quiz section and the answers to the quiz just below says that is one of the false ones).

The actual number is 65%.

3
RisingTidePod 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you point to any of these truckers from all over announcing a boycott? Because aside from that one single guy who backed down, I'm not seeing any others.

4
RisingTidePod 4 points ago +6 / -2

Wait, so you think it's more likely that they edited every existing copy of that book, including the original German versions, than it is that some Twitter user put random audio and subtitles over still images of Hitler?

There's plenty of film with audio of Hitler speaking that has been around for many decades that contradicts this obvious neo-nazi propaganda.

I mean, this is wackier than those clips from Der Untergang where people subtitle Hitler talking about pop culture and video games.

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

This ruling just means literally nothing has changed. If none of those presidents have been dialed up yet, it's not going to happen.

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right? So is Trump trying to set a precedent that Biden has immunity for anything he does in the next 12 months?

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good research. Is there any about what CIC is doing?

0
RisingTidePod 0 points ago +1 / -1

So a song about nothing on its own? Boring.

Also this looks like someone just played their song over someone else's video.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't have instant cures for almost anything serious. What makes you think a product will miraculously appear that can cure all of them instantly?

Eventually? Sure, but like hundreds/thousands of years from now. Anyone claiming it's just around the corner because it's being secretly developed is a scammer.

3
RisingTidePod 3 points ago +4 / -1

Um. He tried to back out of the deal and their lawyers forced him back into it.

Like three times.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, well LogicCircuits said Covid antibodies. I've tested positive for Covid antibodies since I got sick (none of my friends do who didn't get Covid). So where do I get this test that differentiates between Covid antibodies and vax antibodies?

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

What research can we trust if we can't trust anything? Serious question.

1
RisingTidePod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, but people are free to lack common sense. This shit doesn't affect me or Sanders' constituents at all, so why is a governor spending time and money to limit people's freedom of speech?

And if someone was offended by being referred to as a non-gendered, yet still accurate term, that is their own problem.

2
RisingTidePod 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was officially one of his lawyers after the election.

view more: Next ›