You're losing it bro! Relax man. You're gonna blow a gasket.

The ship gyro works on a flat plane just fine. You're caught in the same sort of conundrum as so many are, like the Erashtothenes "stick proof" which only works on a globe if all the Jesuit/freemason-invented "distances" are relevant. It's an argument nobody can win as the globers insist the cited distances are right and the FE'ers say no way. Nobody wins. The globers don't even have the decency to admit that if the sun was indeed only 3000-4000 miles away then the "stick proof" would work on a flat earth plane. They all have zero credibility in my eyes for behaving in this way. They whine and cry like the libtard leftists that they apparently are. Same behavior. Zero cordiality.

I don't know what I don't know about the marine gyro. Honestly, I've never heard anybody bring it up in relation to the earth shape argument. So what can I say about it? What I do know is I've seen hundreds of other so-called "globe proofs" get shot down over the past 5 years, so I expect this to also go the way of the dodo bird too. But hey, maybe you're right!!!!

I'll definitely check it out and see what I can learn. What I do know with certainty is that the SEXTANT was used by sea captains for centuries to navigate the oceans. And a sextant **ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY REQUIRES A FLAT PLANE to complete the triangle. The arguments I've listened to from globers on this topic are also pathetic. Zero reason, zero logic, more nonsensical leftist whining!!!

Your whole "bet" rules are reasonable if you also had skin in the game. But since you don't, all of that escrow and contract stuff is a pointless waste of time and money. Worst case scenario, your "proof" turns out to be correct and you destroy the FE movement but don't get paid. You really aren't losing anything. You could probably sue Dave though. I'm sure he would do a simple contract with you however.

But if you're willing to wager 3 bitcoin ($~54,000 USD) of your own, now that's a different story. I can arrange the contract, escrow and bet for you if this is the case. Just let me know and I'll get in touch with Dave. You'll obviously have to Dox yourself at that point. Are you game?

You do realize your marine gyro must show that its readings would have to be impossible on a flat plane, right? I'm guessing this is at the core of the confusion but I don't know for sure. If the FE group can show how it would work on a plane, then we're just right back to square zero. We shall see. I'll ask a few guys that I know and see if they've ever looked at it.

I've just seen so many arguments about how star observations or planetary precessions, or the appearance of the sun not getting smaller, or constellations in different hemispheres prove the globe but in reality, they do nothing of the sort. I'd say most of the "things" we see in the sky aren't "things" at all. Wouldn't that be something? Is projected light a "thing"? Assuming you agree that it's not a "thing" like a rock or a burning ball of helium is a "thing". I don't know for sure, but that's what I suspect.

Anyway, all these arguments are based on impossible to verify or prove distances, sizes, optical effects and a whole host of other variables. The FE'ers can't prove to the globers what they say is happening and vice versa. It's all theory and speculation in this realm.

The reason I highly doubt your marine gyro "proof" is because I know we can see way too far for the "curvature" to be true. This is a problem none of you globers ever seem to want to address. All I've ever heard is the FE'ers are "lying" about all their videos and pictures. That's a cop out of course, as I have personally seen objects way too far away through a Nikon P900 myself. My own eyes aren't lying. As such, if this is the only defense the globers have for all these photos and pictures, then I can only conclude we're dealing with a bunch of whiney adolescents that refuse to acknowledge the obvious.

Have you attempted to look at objects "beyond the curvature" with a telephoto lens yet? If not, why not?