DJT indirectly supporting and pointing towards SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 case? - The Great Awakening

246

DJT indirectly supporting and pointing towards SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 case? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 1 year ago by mnpsna 1 year ago by mnpsna +247 / -1

44 comments download

44 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (44)

sorted by:

▲ 9 ▼

– GGRockz 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

I sure the hell hope so.

Not sure my faith will hold.

However I extremely have faith in God 🙏🙏.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– eagledriver 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

As I DO in the Faith of God... HOWEVER, I do believe that the SC's will come to what sense they have left BECAUSE their asses are on the line...

does this country need an uprising (civil war) to correct the wrongs in the states...do they?
Do they NOT realize that there are more of us than the FEDERAL Gov put together?

Remember back in the '80s (I think?) that the semi-trucks WITH trailers shut down DC? I do...and the SC's know history and they know that history WILL NOT BE KIND TO THEM...and there has been a SC Justice who regretted what he did when passing Madelyn O' Hares abortion case... ...HE REGRETTED THE DECISION TO THE DAY HE DIED!!!

NOTE (for historical purposes): these are broad stroke(s) of what took place BUT if there are any corrections...well, one knows what to do... TANGO YANKEE!!!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– GGRockz 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I hold hope you are correct.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q