I think you've misread my reply. I was agreeing with item number 2 in your coment: "Why do you believe this is true? The website in the linked article is completely anonymous. There is zero information about who founded it, funds it, or works for it. There is no information out there that I can find concerning this that isn't using this same article as the source. website". I was simply trying to see whether or not the story was true, and whether or not there was any police bodycam footage. I simply followed your suggestion and described what I found.
I think you've misread my reply. I was agreeing with item number 2 in your coment: "Why do you believe this is true? The website in the linked article is completely anonymous. There is zero information about who founded it, funds it, or works for it. There is no information out there that I can find concerning this that isn't using this same article as the source. website". I was simply trying to see whether or not the story was true, and whether or not there was any police bodycam footage. I simply followed your suggestion and described what I found.
Gotcha. Sorry for reading something in it that wasn't there.