Supreme Court Decision Pending In Little Known Case
(www.supremecourt.gov)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
it's my understanding the defendants (ALL OF THEM) failed to even reply to the plaintiffs motion for judicial review. this is strange any any case to say the least, nevermind a case with this many named defendants of such prominent/powerful positions. not sure how to interpret....they know it's going no where since they have judges/court under their thumb?...they are attempting to convince the court the matter is not worth their response (highly unlikely as even the most frivolous claims get responses calling out the frivolousness to get them dismissed)
just all around odd to me
wow that's the height of arrogance and over-confidence. I want that judge to consider their disrespect when it's his turn to communicate to the parties. Fair to say that they're going to pull 388 darrell brookses!