So i've watched every McCullough, Korry, Cole, Malone, etc... interview and podcast. All of them say that the problem with the vaccine is that the vaccine is replicating the wrong part of the virus, the spike protein, which is causing all the blood clots. I understand all of that, but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65. If the problem with the spike is that it causes the blood clots, why would it be safe for people over 65? As you get older your body’s ability to create plasmin (the natural enzyme that breaks down blood clots) diminishes, while the ability and rate of creating clots increases. For a very long time, this idea of over 65 confused me. The only thing i can think of is hormones. Older people do not have hormones, like testosterone, like the young and healthy.. but older people still have a harder time creating plasmin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Just guessing, but maybe some substance in the jab needs adrenaline (or similar) to activate (to kill the host), such as when young athletes are running. One would expect older people to not be exercising vigorously like that. Heart rate rise, internal body temp, spike in adrenaline, other physiological changes during activity that an older person is unlikely to experience.
That said, my elderly friend never felt right after getting the jab, progressively worse after boosters then died of SADS. Another got an aggressive cancer out of the blue and died, another had heart issues and died, was previously healthy... so I believe the jabs are still dangerous for older people.
Your hormone-enzyme theory sounds plausible also. I have no idea why these docs are saying the jabs are safe for older people, but they SHOULD be giving their REASONS when they make claims like that.