you guys understand that Nuremburg 1 was essentially a couple thousand jews and crisis actors hanging out torturing germans into confessing a narrative that didn't happen right?
I don't know why you would use that as a template.
Its their reality so they understand the concept proposed. Everyone knows Nuremberg2 means hanging responsible parties for their role in crimes against humanity. I get that you didn't celebrate Christmas because you know that Christ was born on September11, 3ad not the pagan holiday on December25. Everyone knows Christmas means dec25 so no explanation is necessary. Nuremberg2 needs to happen regardless of the validity of the first one.
By doing what you say STOPS the conflation of Nuremberg...I totally agree that Nuremberg-2 NEEDS to happen WITHOUT the historical references to the first one...I CARE NOT ONE WIT ABOUT Nuremberg 1!!!!
Gitmo was expanded at a cost so that it takes place there on US SOIL since the crimes were committed on US soil with FOREIGN ACTORS present...they all get the DEATH SENTENCE...THE ENTIRE INTEL/FDA/CDC/AMA/etc. MUST BE CLEANED OUT!!!
AND parts of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DISBANDED that does NOT FOLLOW WHAT OUR FOUNDERS PUT DOWN FOR US...
EXAMPLES need to be made and I'm quite sure they will be...
I am NOT a vindictive person BUT all of this was brought on with the
TRILATERAL COMMISSION IN 1913...ANY WHO COMMITTED CRIMES GETS HUNG, SHOT, OR ELECTROCUTED...END OF F$CKING STORY!!!
Nuremberg2 is Due process with trials. Mobs hanging covidiots and vaxtards from lamp posts is not due process. If you lied to your patients or employees about viruses, masks, treatments and experimental injections, then yes yoU should be very afraid of Nuremberg2 trials.
It's the name and what normies were told about it. Normies know that it was a big trial for some nazis (why so few, nobody ever asked), as a way to parade them to the world so it never happens again. They wouldn't believe the truth.
you guys understand that Nuremburg 1 was essentially a couple thousand jews and crisis actors hanging out torturing germans into confessing a narrative that didn't happen right?
I don't know why you would use that as a template.
Its their reality so they understand the concept proposed. Everyone knows Nuremberg2 means hanging responsible parties for their role in crimes against humanity. I get that you didn't celebrate Christmas because you know that Christ was born on September11, 3ad not the pagan holiday on December25. Everyone knows Christmas means dec25 so no explanation is necessary. Nuremberg2 needs to happen regardless of the validity of the first one.
By doing what you say STOPS the conflation of Nuremberg...I totally agree that Nuremberg-2 NEEDS to happen WITHOUT the historical references to the first one...I CARE NOT ONE WIT ABOUT Nuremberg 1!!!!
Gitmo was expanded at a cost so that it takes place there on US SOIL since the crimes were committed on US soil with FOREIGN ACTORS present...they all get the DEATH SENTENCE...THE ENTIRE INTEL/FDA/CDC/AMA/etc. MUST BE CLEANED OUT!!!
AND parts of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DISBANDED that does NOT FOLLOW WHAT OUR FOUNDERS PUT DOWN FOR US...
EXAMPLES need to be made and I'm quite sure they will be...
I am NOT a vindictive person BUT all of this was brought on with the TRILATERAL COMMISSION IN 1913...ANY WHO COMMITTED CRIMES GETS HUNG, SHOT, OR ELECTROCUTED...END OF F$CKING STORY!!!
Nuremberg2 is Due process with trials. Mobs hanging covidiots and vaxtards from lamp posts is not due process. If you lied to your patients or employees about viruses, masks, treatments and experimental injections, then yes yoU should be very afraid of Nuremberg2 trials.
Sure lol
Which is why you’re modeling it on a fiction. Because it’s going to be so real.
In 2 weeks.
It's the name and what normies were told about it. Normies know that it was a big trial for some nazis (why so few, nobody ever asked), as a way to parade them to the world so it never happens again. They wouldn't believe the truth.
So you want to help the normies (apparently there is a lot of normies on GA) by lying to them?
I never insinuated that we should lie to them. How did you even arrive at that?