Should Twitter buy Substack? Musk: "I'm open to the idea." WELL!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
In a perfect world, I would say its a bad idea. Better two have two thriving ecosystems independant of each other.
However, we know that anything left alone will get subverted by the Cabal's magic money, so in this case it might be a better idea to bring substack under Elon's control.
You are touching on a major concern I have, but also make a great counter argument.
That being, substack is already a beacon for truth and we should not fix what is not broken. To your own counter point, Elon's wealth would put a moat around it.
That's assuming Elon's control is an upgrade from their current position. The Twitter purchase has been good for us, and for a select few people who had been kicked off and have now been brought back, but it's too soon to say whether we're benefitting in the long term from Elon's purchase.
Merging the bird and SubStack would likely benefit Twitter, but I still don't trust Elon yet. He remains a technoglobalist, just a rival to the WEF set of technoglobalists.
If there is talk of Elon taking over Substack, my guess is, the enemy is already making a move on Substack. This makes sense since before Elon, for the past 2 years, substack has been the primary mode of disseminating the truth.
Ultimately, I want to see Twitter buried in a graveyard, or the TS backyard. As for substack, I want it to be fully free, post-Awakening.