It's been my contention that evidence of election fraud has to be presented, and proven, along with proving that the House members knew of it, in order for them to be held negligent in going through with validation of the election. So, even if they lose the case on the grounds of the Reps saying, "we didn't know", the proof of election fraud will be made public.
It's been my contention that evidence of election fraud has to be presented, and proven, along with proving that the House members knew of it, in order for them to be held negligent in going through with validation of the election. So, even if they lose the case on the grounds of the Reps saying, "we didn't know", the proof of election fraud will be made public.