SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 Case- Impeachment of members of Congress not required as Court has power to remove all 388 Defendants from holding office if found guilty under charges of Treason due to violation of their oath by not investigating the claims of election fraud and adhering to the enemy! - The Great Awakening

SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 Case- Impeachment of members of Congress not required as Court has power to remove all 388 Defendants from holding office if found guilty under charges of Treason due to violation of their oath by not investigating the claims of election fraud and adhering to the enemy! (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 1 year ago by mnpsna 1 year ago by mnpsna +234 / -3

81 comments download

81 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (81)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– ImaSueDeNym 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

On January 6th, they will decide if they're going to hear the case or not.

I think many people are misunderstanding and thinking that the SC has already decided to hear the case and it will be presented on January 6th.

I think there are going to be a hell of a lot of disappointed people out there on January 6th, because I sincerely doubt that they will accept this case.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Mary911 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm not datefagging this as I know it will probably not come to fruition. So I will pray that the good Lord puts his loving hand upon this case, opens it up and decides what is best for his people. Amen.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q