Sropped being Q in 2020. Everything since is unverified. Lots of arguing about if it is Q or not and seems there are 2 camps. The "no way in hell it is Q" camp. And the "For some reason, without evidence, Im saying this is Q official" camp.
I like how everything not understood is labeled as "new age" when most of it is rediscovered history and methodology that was buried by dominance seekers. Happy Thor's day.
"Doesn't agree with my world view. Henceforth, it is invalidated." We choosing that route? Within discomfort we may find reflection and growth. Or.. we can close our minds and remain stagnant. I'm not saying saying accept everything the world throws at you but in this particular instance, Q was a relied upon source until the source said something you didnt like.
Unfortunately, you can't prove that. Your view is also based on beliefs. I'm just saying we shouldn't be so quick to discount a reliable source just because something they said doesn't agree with the box we've been conditioned to.
Lol. This isn't Q.
Forgive my ignorance, at what post did it stop being q?
https://qalerts.app/?n=4966
Sropped being Q in 2020. Everything since is unverified. Lots of arguing about if it is Q or not and seems there are 2 camps. The "no way in hell it is Q" camp. And the "For some reason, without evidence, Im saying this is Q official" camp.
It's the new age people who chose to believe this nonsense
I like how everything not understood is labeled as "new age" when most of it is rediscovered history and methodology that was buried by dominance seekers. Happy Thor's day.
All the new batch. Clearly.
"Doesn't agree with my world view. Henceforth, it is invalidated." We choosing that route? Within discomfort we may find reflection and growth. Or.. we can close our minds and remain stagnant. I'm not saying saying accept everything the world throws at you but in this particular instance, Q was a relied upon source until the source said something you didnt like.
No. You've got it backwards. You believe it to be true because you want it to be.
It's not.
Unfortunately, you can't prove that. Your view is also based on beliefs. I'm just saying we shouldn't be so quick to discount a reliable source just because something they said doesn't agree with the box we've been conditioned to.