I mean none of the major doses look like duds at all. They all have roughly similar ratios. A few outliers but none that are coming close to even 10% of afflictions.
Also, where is the data coming from? Is it constantly updated?
Not sure how often it is updated, but I was using it as a resource over a year ago to fight my employer over the required injections. Since then the volume of batch codes and reported deaths, disabilities and Illnesses has increased.
They state that their data is extracted from the VAERS database:
According to data reported in VAERS, reproduced here, adverse events triggered by Pfizer batches have varied widely.
5% of the batches appear to have produced 90% of the adverse reactions
Some Pfizer batches are associated with 30 x the number of deaths and disabilities compared to other batches
Well, yeah, that's sort of the nature of stats. Increased volume = increased potential data output.
Also, the statement here is a little off:
5% of the batches appear to have produced 90% of the adverse reactions
This is true, but look closer at the data. Those 5% of batches also have about 90% of the doses administered. Look down the list, and the vast majority of batches only have a handful of doses that are being tracked. So, it's very reasonable to expect those top 5% to have most of the adverse events
If they share their injection cards, you can look up the batch numbers and the corresponding side effects others have suffered.
How Bad Is My Batch
Batch Code Look up
I mean none of the major doses look like duds at all. They all have roughly similar ratios. A few outliers but none that are coming close to even 10% of afflictions.
Also, where is the data coming from? Is it constantly updated?
Not sure how often it is updated, but I was using it as a resource over a year ago to fight my employer over the required injections. Since then the volume of batch codes and reported deaths, disabilities and Illnesses has increased.
They state that their data is extracted from the VAERS database:
Well, yeah, that's sort of the nature of stats. Increased volume = increased potential data output.
Also, the statement here is a little off:
This is true, but look closer at the data. Those 5% of batches also have about 90% of the doses administered. Look down the list, and the vast majority of batches only have a handful of doses that are being tracked. So, it's very reasonable to expect those top 5% to have most of the adverse events
Check the numbers for Moderna, J&J / Janssen. Might be different ratios.