I haven't read the article you linked yet, but just from the outset it appears to be just like every other inflammatory hit piece ever concocted against the Tates. Whether or not there is any chicanery afoot, when I see articles with slanted, cookie cutter anti-Tate rhetoric like this one I immediately think "propaganda".
Dealing with 6 years of never-Trumping has got my journalistic spider senses tuned into hypersensitivity mode. Now we have ourselves in the 365 days of Never-Tate, which has increased in fervor over the last 6 months or so as he's become more outspoken against the establishment.
Maybe there is something to this story, but as it stands, my skepticism amplifier is cranked to 11.
I haven't read the article you linked yet, but just from the outset it appears to be just like every other inflammatory hit piece ever concocted against the Tates. Whether or not there is any chicanery afoot, when I see articles with slanted, cookie cutter anti-Tate rhetoric like this one I immediately think "propaganda".
Dealing with 6 years of never-Trumping has got my journalistic spider senses tuned into hypersensitivity mode. Now we have ourselves in the 365 days of Never-Tate, which has increased in fervor over the last 6 months or so as he's become more outspoken against the establishment.
Maybe there is something to this story, but as it stands, my skepticism amplifier is cranked to 11.
Maybe you should read the article. The guy's a scumbag.