If I were his lawyer I'd just point out all those quirks are normal kinks in BDSM and it wouldn't be the first time CNC play bit someone in the ass. He basically sounds like a D heavy on the B, S & M.
Not really a D for the sex stuff, that's just a top. It's the TPE and financial domination stuff that puts him out of just the top category.
It's not an effective article for other reasons as this.
I have no opinion on the person.
In general, if you throw a shoe in a crowd of top influencers you're more likely to hit something spooky than real.
I am not saying that of him, I have no idea.
Uh, a little hard to follow what with all the A (abbreviations) - you're saying the various money dealings etc are part of the sex play, and this is often the case, or something? If so I'm not buying that, and certainly not the assertion that the entire rest of the article is ineffective on this basis....
Feel free to clarify if I got it wrong though, the above is honestly just my best guess at what you're trying to say....
Bondage, Domination and Sado-Masochism contains something called a "Financial Dominant" and everything in that article can fall into that and other categories without any criminality. It is not degrading or demeaning if done correctly. It is empowering and rewarding for both parties.
If I were his lawyer I'd just point out all those quirks are normal kinks in BDSM and it wouldn't be the first time CNC play bit someone in the ass. He basically sounds like a D heavy on the B, S & M. Not really a D for the sex stuff, that's just a top. It's the TPE and financial domination stuff that puts him out of just the top category.
It's not an effective article for other reasons as this.
I have no opinion on the person. In general, if you throw a shoe in a crowd of top influencers you're more likely to hit something spooky than real. I am not saying that of him, I have no idea.
Uh, a little hard to follow what with all the A (abbreviations) - you're saying the various money dealings etc are part of the sex play, and this is often the case, or something? If so I'm not buying that, and certainly not the assertion that the entire rest of the article is ineffective on this basis....
Feel free to clarify if I got it wrong though, the above is honestly just my best guess at what you're trying to say....
Bondage, Domination and Sado-Masochism contains something called a "Financial Dominant" and everything in that article can fall into that and other categories without any criminality. It is not degrading or demeaning if done correctly. It is empowering and rewarding for both parties.
OK but I disagree that that's all that's going on here.
Understood.
Barring any other evidence that's my defense strategy as his representation. That's all I'm saying.