Bro I think I speak for all of us when I say you couldn't be more wrong about what you're insinuating. I am not a fan of Andrew Tate in any way shape or form.

But if you had even the slightest knowledge of the guy, just did enough research into him from THIS latest thing and had known nothing before you'd realize you're way off.

Now as far as this board is concerned I'm not going to speak for anyone. However your issue or gripe with giving Tate attention here kind of smacks of others who used to cruise thru and make similar arguments about Musk. "Why give him attention" "he's a black hat who cares" "he doesnt matter"

So hows that one going now??

Like it or not Andrew Tate has a MASSIVE FOLLOWING particularly in the realm of young men from teenagers to early 30s. His reach is in the 100s of millions internationally.

So while you may not like him, he has broad influence and thus NEEDS to be discussed because he can be a force for our movement - good or bad. Musk was one example but the other side would be say, Kanye.

And it was good to keep the info flowing on Kanye too. Why? When he turned into a grifter, MK Ultra'd plant attempting to smear and takedown Trump himself?

The more we keep these people in the line of sight the faster we can spot the traitors, move that narrative forward and disconnect ourselves from him. This is important for defense too because there are a TON of people trading on America First and MAGA rn who are nothing but shameless grifters.

Don't think Tate is one, personally. Either way we need to keep track, in places like this.

Yeah but anyway.