NOTE: I do wish people would look at things in light of what has taken place with the Brunson Case...The court PUTTING the case on the docket means they, SCJs will DISCUSS the merits...AND ALSO THE RAMIFICATIONS...

Ok…with all due respect here…where the hell did you come up with this? Did every Brunson case cheerleader here fail civics? Every single case that pays the filing fee and submits all required paperwork “gets on the docket.” That is not remarkable. Nor does SCOTUS “hear the merits” of any case. That is simply not true either.

How does one file an appeal of a federal case? Can you just file an appeal because you didn’t like the outcome? No. You need a reason to appeal. What error(s) did the court make in your case? In Brunson’s case, they never got to any of the merits. Was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What is on appeal is whether any of the causes of action stated in the initial complaint have federal court subject matter jurisdiction. IF they actually wasted their time hearing this case, that is the ONLY issue they would look at. Merits are irrelevant to why they are before this court.

She SIGNED AWAY her right to REPRESENT THE GOVERNMENT

No. Government waived their right to respond to the petition for certiorari. Nobody is going to waste time replying to a bullshit lawsuit with no merit. That is a waste of valuable lawyer work. This case speaks for itself…its bs. It will get dismissed without needing the government to explain why it should be.