Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

30
SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 Case- Video on Constitutional law as it relates to explaining the complaint filed by Brunson brothers before the Supreme Court!! (rumble.com)
posted 2 years ago by mnpsna 2 years ago by mnpsna +31 / -1
12 comments share
12 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

That we even still hear about this case is proof that people will fall for anything. This is a joke lawsuit written by the clueless and wrapped neatly in everyone’s anger about election fraud. I can’t believe it still gets mentioned here multiple times a day. It will not get a single vote to hear this case. Write this down after you downvote me. But don’t downvote me until you have read all the filings in this case at the district/appeals/scotus levels. I have. That’s how I know how big a larp this has turned into. And at least have the balls to come up with something substantive as to why this case is legit if you are going to downvote. You can search my post history if you want to see my issues with this case.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

As a lay person, the only thing I can say is that lot of law experts (including the one in the above video) are also defending this case which should be surprising if there was no merit in this case!

Check this below article written by Professor Tim Canova who teaches law!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/tim-canova-supreme-court-considers-case-seeking-overturn-2020-presidential-election/

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

“The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.”

That didn’t happen. This guy doesn’t even know this. Check out the docket for yourself. “On appeal from the 10th circuit”

As I said before, this is a horrible lawsuit that is cloaked in people’s righteous anger over election fraud and the failure for any elected official to do anything about it. It reeks of grifting.

Any “law experts” defending this have given it away they are not “experts” or they are just plain retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I think you are looking at this case from purely procedural point of view and this is not how Supreme Court does things.

I am looking at this case from national importance point of view. As per allegations in the complaint (which is being explained in this above video), there are 31 states that have violated election laws. I don't think there is any other Court which can decide this issue other than SCOTUS?

You are right that based on past history, SCOTUS will not get involved in this case. But my point is that if they want to get involved, they have full authority and jurisdiction to take action in this case! Let's see what happens!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I am trying to tell people to quit reading all of his hyperbole. It is not of consequence to his claims for relief. In responding to u/OGpat I go through this. 6 claims for relief are in the complaint, all of them dead on arrival. Feel free to read that reply for more detail.

  1. Promissory Estoppel
  2. Promissory Estoppel
  3. Breach of duty
  4. intentional infliction of emotional distress
  5. fraud
  6. civil conspiracy

He simply does not state a viable claim with what is included here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– arathyra 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Yup. DOA, my fren. DOA. The confirmation bias here is strong and revealed with every post on this case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Not only is the confirmation bias at new heights; the leftist mantra of plugging your ears and saying "la la la la la I can't hear you la la la la la" followed by insults such as doomer, shill, etc are also at new heights. Apparently there are a sizable number of people who come here to find truth who simultaneously do not want to hear the truth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FractalizingIron 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

It's really disappointing, to see how many people are downvoting your responses and comments.

Even if people had a different opinion, the quality of your comments speaks for themselves, imo. Clearly stated, seem to be evidence and fact based, instead of rhetorical flourishes.

I quite agree with you about the Brunson thing. It's a particular kind of mental virus that seems to infect certain segments of the population, whether they are neo-Marxist activists, social justice worryers, or truthers. It's a mixture of an inability to take the position of reflecting on your own internal programming that's at work, an inability to acknowledge or recognize your own biases, and an inability to be aware of what emotional and intellectual forces are pulling you along a certain path.

It manifests in a certain type of bravado and yes, a willingness to denigrate and accuse and attack the one who represents the viewpoint you deeply and profoundly wish to reject, due to aforementioned emotional and intellectual forces (programming) that recognizing the other viewpoint would require you to ALSO recognize. So, people ending up wanting to denigrate and reject B at all costs because accepting or even respectfully considering B would inherently entail considering A, and A is what they wish to not see, not hear, not think about and reject AT ALL COSTS.

It's a sort of mass formation psychosis, triggered by the need to lock away any cognitive dissonance. Must avoid cognitive dissonance at all costs, so people will go to uncharacteristic, unreasonable and frequently immoral lengths to do so.

It's a way of existing that is deeply tinged by fear and desperation.

And, sadly, too many people are willing to choose that way, all the while believing that they are "right".

Truthers, and members of the Great Awakening are not immune to that innate human flaw. It's primal fear working at the basest of levels.

That flaw is activated when a person willing accepts the proposition that there can be truth out there they can recognize but that it's not directly tied to and connected to awareness of the truth within me, about who I am, what my flaws and faults are, what my programming might be, and that true freedom only comes with personal, internal awakening. Aka integrity. Both external and internal integrity.

For example, some people simply do NOT want to consider the viewpoint that the Great Hope (e.g. the Brunson case) is perhaps not what they imagine or think or have been told it is. Because doing so would simultaneously require looking inside and reflecting on the LACK of hope there, the LACK of responsible understanding that drives real optimism even in the most difficult and bleakest of situations. Because doing so would expose a lack of faith.

Some people, believing themselves to be people of great faith, have, unfortunately, no faith deep down, not real or substantial faith. They have NOT reconciled internal faith in one's own true nature with external faith in God, the Creator, or Christ, for example.

If one examines all the above issues, stringing from the behavior of professing to seek for truth while denigrating those who challenge one's programming or false beliefs, down to the psychological condition of wanting to reject anything that hints of being able to raise cognitive dissonance, at the end of the day, all those issues are tied to a deep fractice between the inner and the outer dimensions, between what I imagine or think I am and the world is and what I truly and and what the world truly is.

This is the fundamental condition plaguing humanity since the start of history. The only way of resolving it is the path of restoring ourselves to our Creator, to unite the outer man (the human) and the inner man (the divine, God).

I digress, but my point is, all the above are minsfestions of a particular condition that we, as humans, must consistently strive to overcome, in order to be better people. For otherwise, can we even be worthy of the truth or the freedom we seek?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I am just as prone to clinging to my internal biases as anyone else. But perhaps there is a difference in that I am aware that this occurs. And I always seek to step away from that when trying to reason through something. Sometimes I am better at it than other times.

Just as stereotyping serves a function, so does your internal confirmation bias. It helps parse through complex reasoning in an expedient and efficient fashion. And it is mostly reliable. But in this climate, "mostly" isn't close to reliable enough. You have to do your best to discard assumptions and only work with what you can demonstrably prove - either through direct evidence, or deductive reasoning.

The older I get, the more I am willing to accept things I do not like. And much of this I would credit to the last 5-6 years of eye opening revelations. I come from a place where I am tired of being lied to, and sick of living in make believe magic world of larps and bullshit. I want to know reality; even if it sucks. This has made me extremely reluctant to just "accept" things without evidence. Which is why I delved into this Brunson case.

To me, it appears to be an obvious grift. It should cause all of these more prominent figures who are promoting it to lose credibility. After all, if one could read his complaint in the entirety and come away with the thought that there is viability here, what amount of complete bs won't you accept? The alternative is that they never bothered to read it at all. Either way, its a problem.

Most concerning to me is the behavior of this guy after Tracy Beanz wrote that piece on how bad the case is. He actually responded with a statement essentially saying that questioning this case is treason...really? People like that should be ignored immediately and no time spent on hearing their thoughts. That is insane and should alarm everyone.

Would wholeheartedly agree on restoring ourselves to our Creator. Easier said than done. Sometimes I feel these earthly truth pursuits are in conflict with this need.

Good post here, fren. Hope your new year goes great!

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - whdws (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy