As a lay person, the only thing I can say is that lot of law experts (including the one in the above video) are also defending this case which should be surprising if there was no merit in this case!
Check this below article written by Professor Tim Canova who teaches law!
“The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.”
That didn’t happen. This guy doesn’t even know this. Check out the docket for yourself. “On appeal from the 10th circuit”
As I said before, this is a horrible lawsuit that is cloaked in people’s righteous anger over election fraud and the failure for any elected official to do anything about it. It reeks of grifting.
Any “law experts” defending this have given it away they are not “experts” or they are just plain retarded.
I think you are looking at this case from purely procedural point of view and this is not how Supreme Court does things.
I am looking at this case from national importance point of view. As per allegations in the complaint (which is being explained in this above video), there are 31 states that have violated election laws. I don't think there is any other Court which can decide this issue other than SCOTUS?
You are right that based on past history, SCOTUS will not get involved in this case. But my point is that if they want to get involved, they have full authority and jurisdiction to take action in this case! Let's see what happens!
I am trying to tell people to quit reading all of his hyperbole. It is not of consequence to his claims for relief. In responding to u/OGpat I go through this. 6 claims for relief are in the complaint, all of them dead on arrival. Feel free to read that reply for more detail.
Promissory Estoppel
Promissory Estoppel
Breach of duty
intentional infliction of emotional distress
fraud
civil conspiracy
He simply does not state a viable claim with what is included here.
As a lay person, the only thing I can say is that lot of law experts (including the one in the above video) are also defending this case which should be surprising if there was no merit in this case!
Check this below article written by Professor Tim Canova who teaches law!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/tim-canova-supreme-court-considers-case-seeking-overturn-2020-presidential-election/
“The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.”
That didn’t happen. This guy doesn’t even know this. Check out the docket for yourself. “On appeal from the 10th circuit”
As I said before, this is a horrible lawsuit that is cloaked in people’s righteous anger over election fraud and the failure for any elected official to do anything about it. It reeks of grifting.
Any “law experts” defending this have given it away they are not “experts” or they are just plain retarded.
I think you are looking at this case from purely procedural point of view and this is not how Supreme Court does things.
I am looking at this case from national importance point of view. As per allegations in the complaint (which is being explained in this above video), there are 31 states that have violated election laws. I don't think there is any other Court which can decide this issue other than SCOTUS?
You are right that based on past history, SCOTUS will not get involved in this case. But my point is that if they want to get involved, they have full authority and jurisdiction to take action in this case! Let's see what happens!
I am trying to tell people to quit reading all of his hyperbole. It is not of consequence to his claims for relief. In responding to u/OGpat I go through this. 6 claims for relief are in the complaint, all of them dead on arrival. Feel free to read that reply for more detail.
He simply does not state a viable claim with what is included here.