The West is clinging to the impossible dream of hegemony, Russian philosopher tells RT
The conflict in Ukraine is the world’s “first multipolar war,” in which Russia is fighting for the right of every civilisation to choose its own path while the West wishes to maintain its totalitarian hegemonic globalism, Aleksandr Dugin told RT in an exclusive interview on Friday.
Multipolarity is “not against the West as such,” Dugin said, but “against the claim of the West to be the model, to be the unique example,” of history and human understanding. The current Russophobia and [manufactured] hatred of Russia, he argued, are a relic of Cold War thinking and the “bipolar understanding of the architecture of international relations.”
When the Soviet Union self-destructed in December 1991, it left the “global Western liberal civilisation,” in control of the world, Dugin noted. This hegemon is now refusing to accept the future in which it would be “not one of the two, but one of [the] few poles,” put in its proper place as “just a part, not the whole, of humanity.”
Dugin described the West as “pure totalitarian liberalism,” which pretends to have the absolute truth and seeks to impose it on everyone. “There is inherent racism in Western liberalism,” the philosopher told RT’s Donald Courter, because it “identifies the Western historical, political, cultural, experience [as] universal.”
“Nothing universal exists in multipolarity,” Dugin insisted, explaining that each civilisation can and should develop its own values. Russia specifically needs to overcome centuries of Western ideological dominance, he said, and create something “new, fresh, creative,” that would nonetheless stand “in direct refutation of the Western liberal hegemony, against open society, against individualism, against liberal democracy.”
He rejected the “dogmatic,” approaches of Marxism, fascism or liberalism to politics and economics, saying that Russia ought to strive for a “holistic,” approach in which the spiritual would be more important than the material. Obsession with material goods ends up enslaving people, Dugin told RT.
Dugin lamented the December 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union as a “suicide,” perpetrated by the power-hungry bureaucrats in Moscow. He echoed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s description of it as a “geopolitical disaster,” and described it as a major victory for “Sea Power.” While the USSR was the polar opposite of the Russian Empire in terms of ideology, he explained, in geopolitical terms the two were one and the same, the strongest power in what English geographer Harold Mackinder described as the global Heartland.
While some Western observers have dubbed Dugin “Putin’s brain,” the 60-year-old philosopher and author has no official relationship with the Kremlin. He is an outspoken supporter of the current military operation in Ukraine – whose independence he considers a Western imperial project aimed against Russian sovereignty.
Dugin’s daughter Darya, 29, was assassinated in August by a car bomb planted by Ukrainian agents. Though Kiev has officially denied it, US intelligence officials later said they believe someone in the Ukrainian government was responsible.
Credits : Aleksandr Dugin
That's a false dichotomy. Those are not the two choices. Russia is expanding its land mass to try to improve their military standing (this may even be justified, since they drew a red line years ago with NATO). While they're doing that, they are trying to spin a narrative over here that gains sympathy from people disillusioned with globalism. It's a smart move. It doesn't mean we should glorify Russia or hold them up on a pedestal.
There are only two choices, but Russia isn't one of them. You have authoritarianism, and you have freedom. Maybe Russia helps us achieve freedom, but if it ends up with us being anything like historical russia, then I'll take our brand of left wing authoritarianism any day. Russia literally killed 20 million of their own people.
Did you Read the First paragraph of the story???
Does the info the man passed along, sound Familiar to something that happened in American History???
Please help me understand what Russia attacking Ukraine has to do with Russia believing all nations should be able to go in their own direction. I'm pretty sure Ukraine would think otherwise. Literally the reason Russia is attacking is because Ukraine wanted to join NATO. Shouldn't they, as a sovereign nation, fall under the umbrella of nations allowed to choose their own direction?
Russia is waging a propaganda war just as fervently as the United States. It's amusing to see how effective Russia's propaganda war is.
His whole speech doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It acts as if people having freedom is somehow a western ideology. People are born free; that's not an ideology. Governments enslave people.
This is not a battle of differing ideologies on government. It's a battle over freedom. And I can guarantee you if Russia had its way, freedom would not be on the table.
Ukraine is Not a Nation, it is a Federation, a Union of Nations, like the U.S., like the E.U., Like Russia, Like China, which is the MAIN MISUNDERSTANDING most people have....
The Idiot News idiot people know the differences, yet, they still, stubbornly, continue to say that FEDERATIONS are Nations, when they are NOT, nor could they possibly be....
State = Nation....
Federation = Conglomeration....
Both cases are Mutually Exclusive....
So if Ukraine is a federation, then which nation states make up Ukraine?
Oh, a Solid Question, well, if you take the tie to read Emmerich Vattels LAW OF NATIONS, and Skip all the OPINONS, yes they are ALL up at the front, just before the Preliminaries, which is in truth the real First Book, you will learn that the WORDS, Nation and STATE, mean the exact same thing, State=Nation=state=nation, round and round until someone finally figures out that Federation is DIFFERENT than a Nation, Federatio≠Nation, in any possible wy other than by Association....
Federation ≠ Nation....