Your reading comprehension sucks. Try again to understand the concept of multipolar... in which there is no single global superpower. This describes the situation that existed in the world for a very long time, prior to WW2.
The US will be a power, China will be a power, Europe will be a power... etc. Multiple "powers", and no real global superpowers. It is a more stable and equitable arrangement for everyone.
I do believe that the answer is decentralization through nationalism, but even as Trump was promoting and facilitating the very idea you describe, He was promoting the US as a leading the world into that and also being that beacon of freedom. He was not touting a world where we are just another run of the mill country. I read your post correctly. I know what you are saying. I'm just saying a leader will just naturally rise up. That leader will either be a benign leader like a Constitutional US, or an authoritarian one like a Communist China.
Your reading comprehension sucks. Try again to understand the concept of multipolar... in which there is no single global superpower. This describes the situation that existed in the world for a very long time, prior to WW2.
The US will be a power, China will be a power, Europe will be a power... etc. Multiple "powers", and no real global superpowers. It is a more stable and equitable arrangement for everyone.
I do believe that the answer is decentralization through nationalism, but even as Trump was promoting and facilitating the very idea you describe, He was promoting the US as a leading the world into that and also being that beacon of freedom. He was not touting a world where we are just another run of the mill country. I read your post correctly. I know what you are saying. I'm just saying a leader will just naturally rise up. That leader will either be a benign leader like a Constitutional US, or an authoritarian one like a Communist China.