Agreed. I think this is a good thing for the US, especially once we have some success getting rid of the DS/cabal control over so much of our government.
Getting rid of the DS means also getting rid of the endless wars, etc. There is then no point for the US to try to establish itself as a global superpower as it has in the past (to support evil DS agendas). So much of the current geopolitics basically disappears, since it serves no purpose going forward.
Also, if the US dollar is no longer the global reserve currency, that would make it much easier to convert to a new dollar backed by precious metals (gold, silver, platinum), for example.
The rise of the BRICS is a win for the world and a win for the US as well.
You do realize, don't you, that someone is going to try to take the position of global leader. The question is, if not a Constitutional US, then who do you trust to be the global superpower? China?
Your reading comprehension sucks. Try again to understand the concept of multipolar... in which there is no single global superpower. This describes the situation that existed in the world for a very long time, prior to WW2.
The US will be a power, China will be a power, Europe will be a power... etc. Multiple "powers", and no real global superpowers. It is a more stable and equitable arrangement for everyone.
I do believe that the answer is decentralization through nationalism, but even as Trump was promoting and facilitating the very idea you describe, He was promoting the US as a leading the world into that and also being that beacon of freedom. He was not touting a world where we are just another run of the mill country. I read your post correctly. I know what you are saying. I'm just saying a leader will just naturally rise up. That leader will either be a benign leader like a Constitutional US, or an authoritarian one like a Communist China.
BRICS
Agreed. I think this is a good thing for the US, especially once we have some success getting rid of the DS/cabal control over so much of our government.
Getting rid of the DS means also getting rid of the endless wars, etc. There is then no point for the US to try to establish itself as a global superpower as it has in the past (to support evil DS agendas). So much of the current geopolitics basically disappears, since it serves no purpose going forward.
Also, if the US dollar is no longer the global reserve currency, that would make it much easier to convert to a new dollar backed by precious metals (gold, silver, platinum), for example.
The rise of the BRICS is a win for the world and a win for the US as well.
You do realize, don't you, that someone is going to try to take the position of global leader. The question is, if not a Constitutional US, then who do you trust to be the global superpower? China?
Your reading comprehension sucks. Try again to understand the concept of multipolar... in which there is no single global superpower. This describes the situation that existed in the world for a very long time, prior to WW2.
The US will be a power, China will be a power, Europe will be a power... etc. Multiple "powers", and no real global superpowers. It is a more stable and equitable arrangement for everyone.
I do believe that the answer is decentralization through nationalism, but even as Trump was promoting and facilitating the very idea you describe, He was promoting the US as a leading the world into that and also being that beacon of freedom. He was not touting a world where we are just another run of the mill country. I read your post correctly. I know what you are saying. I'm just saying a leader will just naturally rise up. That leader will either be a benign leader like a Constitutional US, or an authoritarian one like a Communist China.